Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
News Feeder

Remorseful Waitress Sends $1,000 and Apology for Money Stolen 20 Years Ago

Recommended Posts

The owner of a popular Tucson, Ariz., restaurant received a letter last week from a former waitress who was so full of remorse over money stolen 20 years ago that she was paying it back -- with interest added. Included in the envelope was $1,000 in cash.

View the original full article

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • GAO reports show that Congress and bureaucrats aren’t watching your money

      By American Media Institute - By Dustin Siggins The federal government isn’t properly safeguarding taxpayer dollars, from Congress on down, according to two recent government reports. On December 7, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported that “over half of” 24 federal agencies were “noncompliant” with improper payment oversight requirements in 2016 and 2017. Nine of those agencies have been compliant since 2011. Improper payments officially totaled over $140 billion in 2017. However, American Media Institute concluded the true number is likely much higher. Improper payments are mostly overpayments and are frequently found in federal health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. GAO’s report identified many government programs which are not in line with laws designed to improve accountability. Heritage Foundation Research Fellow Rachel Grezsler told AMI that “without consequences, it’s impossible to hold CFOs [Chief Financial Officers] and other federal employees accountable.” “Noncompliance should be grounds for disciplining or dismissing CFOs,” continued Greszler,” “but in conjunction, CFOs need authority to discipline and dismiss workers below them who they task with carrying out the compliance.” “Federal employee unions make it nearly impossible to discipline or dismiss federal workers,” said Greszler. Federal employees often make more than their equivalents in the private sector, especially those with lower or middle levels of education. More than one in three public employees are unionized, which allows them to have greater power when attempting to influence federal employment policies like firing. Greszler said that there are also a lot of federal employees whose “roles provide the least value to taxpayers. Policymakers should call into question departments such as the EPA, HUD, and Education that 95 percent non-essential positions.” Poor Oversight Starts at The Top The agency examination report was published shortly after another devastating GAO report on Congress’ oversight of spending. According to that report, “$3.2 trillion in spending authority and permanent appropriations was reported in fiscal year 2015” – all of which is spending “provided to agencies through laws other than annual appropriations acts or available permanently by law without further legislation.” In other words: Trillions of taxpayer dollars were spent without annual Congressional oversight. Permanent appropriations were found to be “the primary driver” of an 88 percent increase in spending analyzed in the report since 1994. Most of the permanent appropriations were in Medicare and Social Security spending, as well as interest payments. Other programs which are not provided annual oversight from Congress are multi-year contracts through the Department of Defense and other agencies. Heritage Foundation budget expert Justin Bogie said in an e-mail that the Department of Transportation and DoD “are the largest utilizers of contract authority in the federal government, which makes since given both agencies use of long-term construction and R&D projects.” According to GAO Acting Director of Strategic Issues Kris Nguyen, GAO “did not assess Congress’ oversight.” She explained that “while we say in our report that Congress does not review spending authority and permanent appropriations annually…our report did not analyze the type or extent of annual oversight that may occur for annual appropriations.” Nguyen also noted “that spending authority and permanent appropriations…are subject to congressional oversight at any point in time” and that GAO “did not analyze…congressional oversight that may have been exercised” in years other than 2015. Heritage Foundation Research Fellow Justin Bogie was more critical. “Congress should get back into a regular cycle of authorizing agencies and programs,” he said. “The authorization process is an opportunity for Congress to carefully review the activities being carried out by federal agencies and determine whether or not they are still fulfilling their original purpose and doing so in an effective and efficient manner.” “Another way that Congress could have better oversite over agencies funding is to move all but the largest entitlements back to the discretionary side of the budget,” Bogie said. “This would give Congress greater control of the year to year growth in these programs and could also help alleviate the use of…budget gimmicks.” While a December 14, 2018 Investor’s Business Daily editorial said the GAO report showed 86 percent of federal spending is on autopilot, both Nguyen and Bogie disagreed. The editorial is likely using data on total outlays for FY 2015, which CBO data reports as $3.7 trillion,” said Nguyen. “The numbers in our report are budget authority.” Bogie explained further. “The $3.2 trillion figure referred to in the GAO report is contract authority and permanent appropriations. This is not the same as what is actually being spent in a given year,” he said. Citing the Congressional Budget Office, Bogie concluded that “at most, about 68 percent of federal spending could have been considered to be on ‘auto-pilot.’” Bogie described this percentage as “alarming.” He said things may get worse because “interest payments are projected to nearly triple over the next decade and Congress has proven unwilling to control spending growth.” Source: American Media Institute GAO reports show that Congress and bureaucrats aren’t watching your money is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Union: Give Us Money Or Employees Who Are Veterans Will Kill Themselves

      By Luke Rosiak - Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert Wilkie is furious after a federal union president said that if politicians don’t end the partial government shutdown, federal employees who are veterans will kill themselves. Edward M. Canales, a local union president with the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), told ABC News that he’s received calls from veterans who aren’t able to support their families during the shutdown and who express “no positive outlook on the future.” Though there is no indication in the story that the employees were suicidal, ABC said Canales referred employees unhappy with the government shutdown to the Department of Veterans Affairs suicide hotline. “If this shutdown does not stop, we are going to have fatalities. We’re going to have suicides,” Canales, a retired prisons employee and veteran, told ABC. He called the shutdown “shameful” and said it is “slapping every veteran in the face who has served their country.” Veterans who receive care and services from the VA are unaffected by the partial government shutdown; all VA employees are also being paid on time as normal. The VA is fully funded for fiscal year 2019 and all VA operations continue unimpeded, the department said. On Monday, Wilkie fired back at AFGE in a letter to national president J. David Cox, saying AFGE was exploiting “the real tragedy of Veteran suicide to make political arguments about the partial Government shutdown.” He went on to dismantle the stereotype of fragile veterans: In 2016, Cox called the House chairman tasked with overseeing the VA a “fool” and said he would “whoop” the VA secretary’s “ass.” The AFGE represents employees of federal agencies including the VA. The VA employs 300,000 people and its union is particularly strong, fighting to block the firing of employees whose misconduct has harmed veterans, and securing policies that, for example, in some case give current federal employees preference over veterans for job openings. When the Department of Defense and the VA merged two of their hospital as an experiment, they found a massive cultural clash between the VA’s unionized, civilian workforce and the DOD’s enlisted hospital employees. The Navy refused to let VA employees treat military men in the ICU, and the VA and DOD co-directors of the hospital were not on speaking terms. The proposal was supposed to save money by reducing redundancies, but the VA union ensured that no VA employees were laid off even though they weren’t needed, defeating the purpose. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] Union: Give Us Money Or Employees Who Are Veterans Will Kill Themselves is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Details Emerging On Money Behind Influential Environmentalist Group

      By Jason Hopkins - A recent profile piece has identified several progressive institutions that are funding the Sunrise Movement, a nascent environmentalist organization that is quickly wielding influence in Washington, D.C. Founded in April 2017, the Sunrise Movement is a newcomer among the many green organizations that have already been established for generations. However, the youth-led climate group has quickly garnered national attention and high-dollar donations from across the country. Between its 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) entities, the group was able to raise just shy of $1 million during 2018 — and members intend to raise $2.5 million in 2019. Despite growing attention from the media, it’s been difficult to pinpoint exactly who is funding the Sunrise Movement. The group is not legally required to disclose their donors. However, a recent report from Inside Philanthropy, an outlet focused on philanthropic groups and their big donors, shed some light. The Rockefeller Fund, the Wallace Global Fund and the Winslow Foundation are core funders of Sunrise Movement. The three groups have continued to finance a large portion of Sunrise’s operations, with institutional funders making up 55 percent of the group’s 2018 budget. Thirty-five percent of its budget came from individual donors, and the rest came from non-profit partners. Sunrise’s core funders have a long history of bankrolling left-wing activities. The Global Wallace Fund has given nearly $7 million to population control groups since the 1990s. The Rockefeller Family Fund has led a war against ExxonMobil, acknowledging that it has colluded with Democratic attorneys general and funded negative media coverage against the oil company. “What’s been nice about [the past month] is that our impact is incredibly clear and everybody is seeing it, because of the way we’ve been able to put truly ambitious and truly equitable climate action on the map in a way that nobody expected,” William Lawrence, co-founder and development director for Sunrise, stated. “That’s opened some doors that might have been closed before, because people are seeing the value of movement building.” Sunrise, which has been an ardent supporter of the Green New Deal, protested outside Nancy Pelosi’s office late last year, demanding the Speaker-in-waiting take more action on climate change. Their efforts received widespread attention when Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — now a New York Democratic congresswoman — joined them in protest. The group enjoyed a surge in donations after the protest. At least some of the salaries for Sunrise Movement staffers, according to Inside Philanthropies, are not based on conventional compensation agreements, but on what members claim they need to support themselves. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] Details Emerging On Money Behind Influential Environmentalist Group is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Progressive Enjoying TV Show She'll Denounce As 'Extremely Problematic' Within Five Years

      TIGARD, OR—According to sources close to local progressive Xen Carson, the woman is really enjoying a recent TV show she discovered, a program she'll inevitably label as "hopelessly problematic" within five years' time. The post Progressive Enjoying TV Show She'll Denounce As 'Extremely Problematic' Within Five Years appeared first on The Babylon Bee. View the original full article

      in Christian Satire

    • Baby Jesus Statue Returned, 90 Years after it Was Stolen

      A small statue of baby Jesus that was stolen from a New Jersey church was returned this year – nearly 90 years after it went missing. View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.