Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
William

There Is No Christian Argument Against Overturning Roe v Wade

Recommended Posts

Staff

The news that Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy will retire next month has immediately conjured up images of a pro-life judge’s taking his place and becoming the crucial fifth piece to strike down Roe v. Wade, the Court’s 1973 affirmation of a universal right to abortion. For pro-life activists and observers, this is a historic opportunity to challenge the bloodiest injustice in America for the past 50 years. While overturning Roe would not itself criminalize abortion, it would blow away the barrier against state-based laws and almost certainly result in at least 20 states outlawing abortion in most circumstances. All it takes is five justices to intervene on behalf of the lives of millions of unborn Americans. It is very close.

 

It is close because Donald Trump won an astonishing election the same year that Justice Antonin Scalia astonishingly died, denying the Democratic Party an opportunity to solidify Roe via President Hillary Clinton. It is close because then-candidate Trump said onstage during a presidential debate that he would seek to overturn Roe if given the opportunity to appoint justices. It is because of the relationship between the judiciary and the executive, a relationship crafted by the men on our dollars and coins, that this opportunity has come. And it is also because of Donald Trump.

This is a hard saying. Who can bear it?

 

In our current age, we are given to making value judgments by association. Because Donald Trump is a man of vice whose administration has pursued some cruel policies (and whose rhetoric tends to exult in such cruelty), some evangelicals will struggle with feeling joy at this vacant Court seat. “I’m personally pro-life,” they might say, “but I just don’t trust Trump, and I don’t like it that people who voted for him seem happy about this.” Thus, they might try to reason themselves into the belief that Roe ought not be overturned, that a pro-life justice ought not be appointed, all because Donald Trump ought not be president and evangelicals ought not be feeling victorious right now.

 

The frustration is understandable, but the logic is not. Evangelicals don’t have to set aside their convictions about race, immigrants, women, or the Religious Right in order to perceive a moral mandate when it comes to abortion. There is no Christian case against overturning Roe. None.

 

Once upon what seems now like a lifetime ago, pro-life evangelicals were united in horror and imprecatory prayer at the undercover videos of Planned Parenthood released by the Center for Medical Progress. Those videos have been legally prosecuted and forgotten, but they have not been unmade. There are many of us who vividly remember where we were when we watched a physician “harvest” the tiny anatomy of an aborted boy (yes, “it’s a boy”), or when we listened to Planned Parenthood reps talk about the money and humor in the trafficking of babies. While these videos were being released, there was no question amongst most evangelicals whether abortion was a cause worth engaging at the highest possible level. There was no Donald Trump and no morally compromised Religious Right to complicate things.

 

Three years later, the producers of those videos are fighting litigation, and many of us who watched and cried and prayed are fighting ourselves. The illusion of virtue in our tribe was dismantled by 2016, by #MeToo, by the children of refugees in prison-like holding cells. It has been terrible. But evangelicals cannot allow the hypocrisy of their elders to blind them to the innocence of their infants. It is not remotely unreasonable or incoherent to stand as far away as possible from the rot of God and country Republicanism while charging alongside it against Roe v. Wade. In fact, it is the only option we have.

 

In a now-deleted tweet, a prominent progressive evangelical writer said though she was “convictionally pro-life” (those slippery adverbs!), she could not support the overturning of Roe v Wade due to all the “effects” it would have. After deleting the tweet, she said that Twitter was obviously not the right place to talk about abortion. Nothing more than a 2 minute perusal of her Twitter account reveals dozens of impassioned threads about everything from gun control to immigration to policing. This sort of double dealing has become rampant among younger, socially conscious evangelicals in the aftermath of Trump’s election. While abortion is a “complex conversation” that requires nuance instead of activism, the issues that the Republican Party morally fails on are apparently no-brainers.

 

I don’t think this attitude necessarily comes from apathy about unborn babies or rank partisanship. I think it mostly comes from fear—fear of becoming the wrong kind of person in the wrong kind of tribe. Again, the fear is understandable, but the rationalization seen above is not. To act as if morally upright Christians cannot support President Trump’s appointment of a justice who would tip the scales against Roe is to prioritize political consistency and tribal identity over human life itself. It is the literal opposite of a Christ-honoring public theology.

 

Martin Luther King famously said that laws could not make white people love black people, but they could keep white people from lynching black people. In other words, a law that doesn’t address the deepest problems but still preserves life is a worthy law. Evangelicals who say that overturning Roe would not destroy back alley abortions need to ponder the truth in King’s statement. The possibility that a law will be broken and that people will suffer is not an argument against a moral law. It’s an argument against us sinful people.  The overturning of Roe would allow states to codify the sanctity of unborn life, and laws do teach. We may not be able to change hearts, but we can shape them as they grow…but only if they’re allowed to beat.

 

Roe v. Wade is a legal catastrophe. It is Constitutional soothsaying. It’s a decision based on discredited scientific claims and cartoon philosophy. Worst of all, it has been the death sentence of over 60 million Americans. Worrying about whether its reversal will register as a win for a president who is unworthy of it is not a competing interest to its destruction. This should not, must not, and cannot be a “white Republican Christian” issue. It’s everyone’s issue. There is no Christian case for keeping Roe. None.

 

Source:

There Is No Christian Argument Against Overturning Roe v Wade – Letter & Liturgy

 

  • Like 4
  • Best Answer 1

Share this post


Link to post

Susan Collins, Republican Senator from Maine would not vote for a nominee who shows hostility to Roe v. Wade because she believes SCOTUS should respect precedent.

For those who are interested, here is a list of SCOTUS decisions that have been overturned/over-ruled/annulled by later SCOTUS decisions:

List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions - Wikipedia

 

It is by no means unusual.........

Share this post


Link to post

Abortion can be ended without overturning Roe v Wade. All that is necessary is that Congress pass a law declaring that life begins at conception.

 

Quote

Working from what the Supreme Court ruled in Roe, pro-life lawmakers can pass a Life at Conception Act and end abortion by using the Constitution instead of amending it.

A simple majority vote in both houses of Congress is all that is needed to pass a Life at Conception Act as opposed to the two-thirds required to add a Constitutional amendment.

When the Supreme Court handed down its now-infamous Roe v. Wade decision, it did so based on a new, previously undefined "right of privacy" which it "discovered" in so-called "emanations" of "penumbrae" of the Constitution.

Of course, as constitutional law it was a disaster. But never once did the Supreme Court declare abortion itself to be a Constitutional right.

Instead the Supreme Court said:

"We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins . . . the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."

Life at Conception Act Would Dismantle Roe Using the Supreme Court's Own Language

Then the High Court made a key admission:

"If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case [i.e. "Roe" who sought the abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."

That's exactly what a Life at Conception Act would do.

Legislative Action

 

However this would not be a good as overturning the ruling because any law passed by Congress can be repealed.

  • Best Answer 1

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
5 minutes ago, theophilus said:

Abortion can be ended without overturning Roe v Wade. All that is necessary is that Congress pass a law declaring that life begins at conception.

Unless the Supreme Court were to decide that law was unconstitutional.

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
7 minutes ago, Origen said:

Unless the Supreme Court were to decide that law was unconstitutional.

Is it me or will this open a can of worms? If such law passed would every child be an American citizen if conceived in the United States? Can a child conceived in the United States then be denied Constitutional rights?

 

I'd think that this would satisfy Liberal/Democrats and bring Republicans onboard (bi-partisan) to accept certain immigration reconsideration.

 

God bless,

William

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
16 minutes ago, William said:

Is it me or will this open a can of worms? If such law passed would every child be an American citizen if conceived in the United States? Can a child conceived in the United States then be denied Constitutional rights?

 

I'd think that this would satisfy Liberal/Democrats and bring Republicans onboard (bi-partisan) to accept certain immigration reconsideration.

William to tell you the truth I believe we are only kidding ourselves.  I truly think that people are being way too optimistic.  I don't believe for one minute that Roe v Wade will be overturn anytime soon.  And even if that were to happen, that would not put any end to abortion.  Then it would be up to the States to decide, and there is no doubt how states like New York,  California, and Washington would come down on the issue.

 

While I am at it, I don't believe the Supreme Court's decision on gay marriage will be overturned.

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
58 minutes ago, Origen said:

William to tell you the truth I believe we are only kidding ourselves.  I truly think that people are being way too optimistic.  I don't believe that for one minute that Roe v Wade will be overturn anytime soon.  And even if that were to happen, that would not put any end to abortion.  Then it would be up to the States to decide, and there is no doubt how states like New York,  California, and Washington would come down on the issue.

 

While I am at it, I don't believe the Supreme Court's decision on gay marriage will be overturned.

Just thinking it through.

 

If an unborn child is declared a person at conception then the child must be protected under the Constitution. The person was conceived and originated in the United States. Unless it is decided that the child is under the providence and/or jurisdiction of the mother which leads back to the mother's right to abortion. Is she given some kind of maritime law where she's the captain of her vessel lol?

 

God bless,

William

 

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Origen said:

William to tell you the truth I believe we are only kidding ourselves.  I truly think that people are being way too optimistic.  I don't believe for one minute that Roe v Wade will be overturn anytime soon.  And even if that were to happen, that would not put any end to abortion.  Then it would be up to the States to decide, and there is no doubt how states like New York,  California, and Washington would come down on the issue.

 

While I am at it, I don't believe the Supreme Court's decision on gay marriage will be overturned.

It appears that political analyst expect 20 conservative States to immediately ban abortion as soon as the conservative justice is confirmed?

 

There were 13 States that had banned same sex marriage by constitutional amendment when it was overturned by SCOTUS in Obergefell V Hodges?

 

California in 2008 voted to ban same sex marriage in Prop (8), it passed by a 53/47 popular vote, and was stopped by a homosexual judge (Vaughn R. Walker)

 

I believe we will see Roe V Wade and Obergefell V Hodges overturned in the next two years, political analyst state it could be sooner?

Edited by Truth7t7
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

The conservatives are already at work as we speak, introduced 3 days before president Trump took the oath of office, we pray they will have enough votes to pass the bill?

 

H.R.586 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

 

Introduced in House (01/17/2017)

 

By Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Allen, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Graves of Georgia, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Latta, Mr. Long, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Olson, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Russell, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, and Mr. Woodall), H552 [17JA]

 

Sanctity of Human Life Act

 

This bill declares that: (1) the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human and is a person's most fundamental right; (2) each human life begins with fertilization, cloning, or its equivalent, at which time every human has all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood; and (3) Congress, each state, the District of Columbia, and each U.S. territory have the authority to protect all human lives.

Edited by Truth7t7
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
40 minutes ago, Truth7t7 said:

It appears that political analyst expect 20 conservative States to immediately ban abortion as soon as the conservative justice is confirmed?

 

There were 13 States that had banned same sex marriage by constitutional amendment when it was overturned by SCOTUS in Obergefell V Hodges?

 

California in 2008 voted to ban same sex marriage in Prop (8), it passed by a 53/47 popular vote, and was stopped by a homosexual judge (Vaughn R. Walker)

 

I believe we will see Roe V Wade and Obergefell V Hodges overturned in the next two years, political analyst state it could be sooner?

I have no doubt some believe it will happen, perhaps within two years.  I for one see no reason to believe it.  If we are still here two years from now, we shall see.

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
41 minutes ago, Truth7t7 said:

The conservatives are already at work as we speak, introduced 3 days before president Trump took the oath of office, we pray they will have enough votes to pass the bill?

 

H.R.586 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

 

Introduced in House (01/17/2017)

 

By Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Allen, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Graves of Georgia, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Latta, Mr. Long, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Olson, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Russell, Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, and Mr. Woodall), H552 [17JA]

 

Sanctity of Human Life Act

 

This bill declares that: (1) the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human and is a person's most fundamental right; (2) each human life begins with fertilization, cloning, or its equivalent, at which time every human has all the legal and constitutional attributes and privileges of personhood; and (3) Congress, each state, the District of Columbia, and each U.S. territory have the authority to protect all human lives.

I like the way it is worded.

 

Thanks for sharing!

 

God bless,

William

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, William said:

If an unborn child is declared a person at conception then the child must be protected under the Constitution. The person was conceived and originated in the United States. Unless it is decided that the child is under the providence and/or jurisdiction of the mother which leads back to the mother's right to abortion. Is she given some kind of maritime law where she's the captain of her vessel lol?

It is an interesting question but you would have to be able to prove time & location of conception.....something tells me SCOTUS might want to punt on that and use the 14th Amendment as the standard.......

Share this post


Link to post
11 hours ago, Origen said:

I have no doubt some believe it will happen, perhaps within two years.  I for one see no reason to believe it.  If we are still here two years from now, we shall see.

Please explain how you believe we will no be here in two years?

 

You can PM me with your views?

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
7 hours ago, Truth7t7 said:

Please explain how you believe we will no be here in two years?

 

 

What?  I did not say I believe we will not be here in two years or anything close to that.

 

Quote

You can PM me with your views?

You want me to PM you concerning my views on things I never said.  Don't read into comments things that are not there.

Share this post


Link to post
On 7/2/2018 at 12:04 PM, Origen said:

I have no doubt some believe it will happen, perhaps within two years.  I for one see no reason to believe it.  If we are still here two years from now, we shall see.

I apologize for inferring you suggested the end of the world, possibly you were considering #1 below?

 

One of two suggestions?

 

1. Possibly we could die before two years?

 

2. The world will end?

Share this post


Link to post
14 minutes ago, Truth7t7 said:

I apologize for inferring you suggested the end of the world, possibly you were considering #1 below?

 

One of two suggestions?

 

1. Possibly we could die before two years?

 

2. The world will end?

3.  We could get raptured?

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
15 minutes ago, Truth7t7 said:

I apologize for inferring you suggested the end of the world, possibly you were considering #1 below?

 

One of two suggestions?

 

1. Possibly we could die before two years?

 

2. The world will end?

Or If "we" as in a group on this website are here in two years, then "we" shall see together.

 

God bless,

William

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
6 minutes ago, William said:

Or If "we" as in a group on this website are here in two years, then "we" shall see together.

 

God bless,

William

CORRECT!  We have a winner!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Staff

-Supplies Gossip phrases on slips of paper Instructions Explain to the players that there won’t be any winners or losers in this game. It’s just for fun. Tell the players to form a line. Hand the first player a slip of paper with a gossip phrase or sentence written on it. This player reads the phrase but doesn’t show it to anyone else. He or she whispers the phrase to the next person in line, who whispers what she thought she heard to the next person, and so on down the line. The last person repeats what he/she heard to the entire group. The first person then tells the group what the phrase actually was. You can play this for as long or short a time as you like. As a variation, you can also have players come up with their own phrases. Use the Alice Franklin sentence for the last round of the game. At the end of the game, explain that the point of the game is to demonstrate how information gets distorted as it passes from person to person. Just like in The Truth about Alice, gossip warps the truth into exaggerations or even lies.

Share this post


Link to post
On 7/2/2018 at 12:03 PM, Origen said:

Unless the Supreme Court were to decide that law was unconstitutional.

The People of this nation have for to long been absent.  President Trump is the first Peopleś's President since Ronnie Reagan and it is past time for the Executive and the Congressional Branches to drop weights on the heads of the Liberal Baboons on SCOTUS to bring them back int ocompliance with the Lawful Constitution of this nation .

  • Best Answer 1

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Becky said:

-Supplies Gossip phrases on slips of paper Instructions Explain to the players that there won’t be any winners or losers in this game. It’s just for fun. Tell the players to form a line. Hand the first player a slip of paper with a gossip phrase or sentence written on it. This player reads the phrase but doesn’t show it to anyone else. He or she whispers the phrase to the next person in line, who whispers what she thought she heard to the next person, and so on down the line. The last person repeats what he/she heard to the entire group. The first person then tells the group what the phrase actually was. You can play this for as long or short a time as you like. As a variation, you can also have players come up with their own phrases. Use the Alice Franklin sentence for the last round of the game. At the end of the game, explain that the point of the game is to demonstrate how information gets distorted as it passes from person to person. Just like in The Truth about Alice, gossip warps the truth into exaggerations or even lies.

No gossip?

 

It's a fact that justice Kennedy retired and a conservative will fill the spot, announcement will be June 9th 2018 who Trumps nominee is.

 

It's a fact that overturning Roe v Wade is a #1 priority, even the liberals agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
2 hours ago, Bill Taylor said:

the Executive and the Congressional Branches to drop weights on the heads of the Liberal Baboons on SCOTUS 

There is little if anything they can do.  Supreme Court justices are appointed for life.  Unless a justice retires\resigns or dies that justice is there to stay.    Of course a justice could be impeached.  That has happen only once (i.e. Samuel Chase).  It went nowhere.

 

When you say, "drop weights on their heads" how would that work?  What is the method?  If the Executive and the Congressional Branches forces judges to conform,  then the court is no longer a separate and equal branch of government.

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
1 hour ago, Truth7t7 said:

It's a fact that overturning Roe v Wade is a #1 priority, even the liberals agree.

What do you expect them to say?  I see no reason to accept what the liberals says as truth.  Everything Trump does or says, according to them, will bring about the end of the world.  That claim by them is nothing more than an example of their fear and hate tactics.  As I said above, I doubt it will happen but time will tell.  All we have to do is wait and see.

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
1 hour ago, Truth7t7 said:

No gossip?

 

It's a fact that justice Kennedy retired and a conservative will fill the spot, announcement will be June 9th 2018 who Trumps nominee is.

 

It's a fact that overturning Roe v Wade is a #1 priority, even the liberals agree.

I hope you understood my little joke was about how we were taken up in Origen's words . 

Share this post


Link to post
18 minutes ago, Becky said:

I hope you understood my little joke was about how we were taken up in Origen's words . 

No problem, thanks for the response.

  • Best Answer 1

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • The Countries Where It’s Most Dangerous to Be a Christian in 2019

      One in every nine Christians in the world lives in an area, or in a culture, in which Christianity is illegal, forbidden, or punished, according to the latest report on global persecution by Open Doors USA. That’s a 14 percent increase over the previous year. For the past 27 years, the organization has published the Open Doors World Watch List, a global indicator of countries where human and religious rights are being violated, and those countries most vulnerable to societal unrest and destabilization. During the World Watch List 2019 reporting period, in the top 50 countries, a total of 1,266 churches or Christian buildings were attacked; 2,635 Christians were detained without trial, arrested, sentenced and imprisoned; and 4,136 Christians were killed for faith-related reasons. On average, that’s 11 Christians killed every day for their faith. Countries are ranked by the severity of persecution of Christians, calculated by analyzing the level of violent persecution plus the pressure experienced in five spheres of life: church, national, community, family, and private. Based on the report’s research, the top 10 nations where Christians found it most dangerous and difficult to practice their faith are: 1. North Korea Persecution type: Communist and Post-Communist Oppression Estimated number of Christians: 300,000 How Christians are suffering: “The primary driver of persecution in North Korea is the state. For three generations, everything in the country has focused on idolizing the Kim family. Christians are seen as hostiles to be eradicated. There was hope that new diplomatic efforts in 2018—including the 2018 Winter Olympics—would mean a lessening of pressure and violence against Christians, but so far that has not been the case. Kim Jong-un has maintained tight control over the populace, and dissent or worshiping anything else is not tolerated.” Prayer point: “The situation for Christians is vulnerable and precarious. They face persecution from state authorities and their non-Christian family, friends and neighbors. Pray for their protection.” 2. Afghanistan Persecution type: Islamic oppression Estimated number of Christians: Thousands How Christians are suffering: “Afghanistan is an Islamic state by constitution, which means government officials, ethnic group leaders, religious officials and citizens are hostile toward adherents of any other religion. This means any expression of any faith other than Islam is simply not permitted to exist. Additionally, to convert to a faith outside Islam is tantamount to treason, because it is seen as a betrayal of family, tribe, and country.” Prayer Point: “Christian converts from Islam face strong pressure from family, friends and neighbors and can even be attacked. Pray for these believers to have courage and protection.” 3. Somalia Persecution type: Islamic oppression Estimated number of Christians: A few hundred How Christians are suffering: “Estimates suggest that 99 percent of Somalis are Muslims, and any minority religions are heavily persecuted. The Christian community is small and under constant threat of attack. Sharia law and Islam are enshrined in the country’s constitution, and the persecution of Christians almost always involves violence. Additionally, in many rural areas, Islamic militant groups like al-Shabab are de facto rulers.” Prayer point: “Somali Christians often must hide their faith to stay safe. Pray for the safety and discipleship opportunities for these isolated believers.” 4. Libya Persecution type: Islamic oppression Estimated number of Christians: 37,900 How Christians are suffering: “After the ouster of former dictator Muammar Gaddafi, Libya plunged into chaos and anarchy, which has enabled various Islamic militant groups to control parts of the country. Converts to Christianity face abuse and violence for their decision to follow Christ. Libya is also home to many migrant workers who have been attacked, sexually assaulted, and detained, which can be even worse if it is discovered they are Christians.” Prayer point: “Pray for the protection of migrant workers, especially for those who are Christians and face double persecution.” 5. Pakistan Persecution type: Islamic oppression Estimated number of Christians: 3,981,000 How Christians are suffering: “Under Pakistan’s notorious blasphemy laws, Christians continue to live in daily fear they will be accused of blasphemy—which can carry a penalty of death. Additionally, radical Islamists seem to be gaining more political power, and the new ruling government must maintain good diplomatic relationships with some radical groups. Christians are largely regarded as second-class citizens, and conversion to Christianity from Islam carries a great deal of risk.” Prayer point: “Pray for Pakistani converts from Muslim backgrounds who suffer the brunt of the persecution in Pakistan. Radical Islamist groups see them as apostates, and their family, friends, and neighbors see their conversion as shameful to the community.” 6. Sudan Persecution type: Islamic oppression Estimated number of Christians: 1,910,000 How Christians are suffering: “Sudan has been ruled by the authoritarian government of President al-Bashir since 1989. The country has been ruled as an Islamic state with limited rights for religious minorities and heavy restrictions on freedom of speech and press. Christians face discrimination and pressure—multiple church buildings were demolished in 2017 and 2018, leaving some Christians without a place to worship. Christian converts from Islam are especially targeted for persecution.’” Prayer point: “Pray for converts to Christianity, that they would be able to stand strong in the face of accusations of betrayal.” 7. Eritrea Persecution type: Dictatorial paranoia Estimated number of Christians: 2,474,000 How Christians are suffering: “Since 1993, President Afwerki has overseen a brutal authoritarian regime that rests on massive human rights violations. In 2018, there were raids on churches, and hundreds of Christians were imprisoned in inhumane conditions. Additionally, there are estimates that other Christians are currently in Eritrea’s vast prison network, but no one knows how many there are or if they are still alive.” Prayer point: “Thousands of Christians have been imprisoned in Eritrea over the last decade. Pray for endurance for brothers and sisters detained in horrific conditions, and ask God to give them perseverance in their faith.” 8. Yemen Persecution type: Islamic oppression Estimated number of Christians: A few thousand How Christians are suffering: “An ongoing civil war in Yemen has created one of the worst humanitarian crises in recent memory, making an already difficult nation for Christians even harder. The chaos of war has enabled radical groups to take control over some regions of Yemen, and they have increased persecution against Christians. Even private worship is risky in some parts of the country. Converts to Christianity from Islam face additional persecution from family and society.” Prayer point: “The instability in Yemen has created a refugee, food, and health-care crisis. Ask God to help provide food, clean water and safety to the people of Yemen.” 9. Iran Persecution type: Islamic oppression Estimated number of Christians: 800,000 How Christians are suffering: “Christians are forbidden from sharing their faith with non-Christians. Therefore, church services in Persian, the national language, are not allowed. Converts from Islam face persecution from the government; if they attend an underground house church, they face the constant threat of arrest. Iranian society is governed by Islamic law, which means the rights and professional possibilities for Christians are heavily restricted.” Prayer point: “Any Muslim who leaves Islam faces a charge of apostasy and can be thrown in jail or worse. Pray that the laws will change, allowing for freedom of religion.” 10. India Persecution type: Religious nationalism Estimated number of Christians: 65,061,000 How Christians are suffering: “Christians have been targeted by Hindu nationalist extremists more each year. Since the current ruling party took power in 2014, attacks have increased, and Hindu radicals believe they can attack Christians with no consequences. The view of the nationalists is that to be Indian is to be Hindu, so any other faith— including Christianity—is viewed as non-Indian. Additionally, in some regions of the country, converts to Christianity from Hinduism experience extreme persecution, discrimination, and violence.’” Prayer point: “Pray for Christian converts from Hinduism who are forcefully pressured to return to their national religion.” View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

    • LifeWay Christian Store Announces They Are Closing Several Locations

      Popular Christian book store, LifeWay Christian Store announced Wednesday that would be closing several of its store locations due to a significant decline in sales. View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

    • 'Criticism of Christian Education in America Should Stop,' Vice President Pence Defends His Wife amid Media Backlash

      Vice President Mike Pence’s wife was the target of criticism this week after she announced that she would be teaching art at a private conservative Christian school, and the Vice President is stepping up to defend her. View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

    • Gnostic Christian

      I am a Gnostic Christian and tend to not last long in Christian sites.   I guess that the reason for that is the same as it was when the early Christian church decimated us and burned our scripture.   They could not take criticism well or argue against us in a reasonable way and chose to kill us instead.   Can those here, including the mods handle criticism?   I do try to be as civil as possible but know that even civil criticism is not tolerated well in many Christian sites   Thoughts?   Regards DL

      in Exploring Christianity

    • How to Form a Christian Mind in a Digital World

      Many have rightly warned that evangelicals are losing “a Christian mind” by neglecting the Bible and indiscriminately consuming secular materials informed by non-Christian ideas. But what if it’s not just the content we consume but also the medium in which we read it that poses a danger to our minds? In Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World, Maryanne Wolf makes a compelling case that our use of digital devices is changing the way we read, which in turn is profoundly altering the way we think—a chilling prospect for Christians, who believe that through his written Word, God renews our minds, enabling us to think in sanctified ways. Digital Challenges Although Wolf—a Tufts University professor who has studied the neurological processes involved in the act of reading—has no such spiritual concerns, she believes the stakes in our transition from a print to a digital culture are incredibly high. Again and again she confronts her readers with sobering questions: “Will new readers develop the more time-demanding cognitive processes nurtured by print-based mediums as they absorb and acquire new cognitive capacities emphasized by digital media?” “Will our youth develop such a passive response to knowledge that eventually the store of what they know and their ability to connect it through analogy and inference will be depleted?” “Will the combination of reading on digital formats and daily immersion in a variety of digital experiences . . . impede the formation of the slower cognitive processes such as critical thinking, personal reflection, imagination, and empathy that are part of deep reading?” “Will the quality of our attention change as we read on mediums that advantage immediacy, dart-quick task switching, and continuous monitoring of distraction . . . ?” Wolf obviously sees a strong possibility that the answers to these questions might be yes. The reason? In her early research, she studied what happens within the brain when we read. Eventually she became concerned about “how the circuitry of the reading brain would be altered by the unique characteristics of the digital medium, particularly in the young.” Her conclusion is that since the advent of the digital age, “we have already begun to change how we read—with all of its many implications for how we think.” Reading Brain On the opening page of the book, Wolf declares provocatively that “human beings were never born to read,” by which she means that reading isn’t something our brains are hardwired to do, such as seeing or communicating. Rather, reading is “an unnatural cultural invention” that we must learn. This we’re able to do since our brain cells can make myriad connections, leading to the formation in each emerging reader of a “reading circuit” that links centers of the brain concerned with such crucial tasks as vision, language, cognition, motor functions, and affective functions. However, she warns that digital devices pose a threat to the development of this mental circuitry—not because digital reading is fundamentally different from print reading, but because the digital medium deluges us with information in byte-sized chunks, promoting information overload and distraction. As evidence, Wolf notes that students today are demonstrating “diminishing familiarity with conceptually demanding prose.” Wolf sees numerous dangers here: shrinking attention spans that preclude “deep reading” (her term for focused, thoughtful reading), which in turn leads to failure to gain the empathy for others that reading engenders and the kind of personal store of knowledge that enables inference, deduction, and analogical thinking. Christians might perceive an overarching danger: a reduction in our ability to grasp God’s truth through deep reading of his Word. Clearly God created us with the capacity to learn the complex process of reading so that we might benefit from his written revelation, the Bible. But the Word of God is a challenging book, a prime example of “conceptually demanding prose” that requires attentive, reflective reading. Are we willing to let our digital pottage make us poorer students of this treasure? Reader Recommendations What is to be done? Wolf’s recommendation isn’t simply that young readers be denied exposure to digital devices—indeed, she is surprisingly open to their use—but that such exposure be meted out in careful doses. She urges parents of children up to age 5 to read to them often, giving them little access to digital devices. “Human interaction and physical interaction with books and print are the best entry into the world of oral and written language and internalized knowledge, the building blocks of the later reading circuit,” she writes. As for children 5 to 10 years of age, Wolf wants them develop a “biliterate brain” by learning in both print and digital mediums. Physical books are her preferred tool for reading instruction, while digital devices might be used to teach coding, programming, and creative skills such as graphic arts and musical composition. In other words, she envisions a two-track learning approach, with the understanding that students can safely combine print and digital media only when their mental reading circuits are firmly established around fourth grade. Thereafter, the goal is to prevent those circuits from atrophying. Digital Wisdom Whether many schools would agree to adopt such an approach, there is wisdom here for Christian parents, who must always be their children’s prime educators. If you’re a parent, read the Bible to your children from an early age, along with age-appropriate Bible storybooks and well-written (and well-illustrated) children’s books. As they grow, introduce them to classic literary works. Let them hear both biblical truth and also beautiful language. Through the exhausting early years of child-rearing, fight the terrible temptation to let a smartphone or tablet serve as a babysitter, much as parents a generation ago had to resist the siren song of TV. Keep books in your home for this purpose, whether owned or borrowed from the local library. Don’t let down your guard as your children acquire the ability to read for themselves. Help them find books that appeal to their expanding interests. When the time is right, these might include eBooks, but as much as possible help them use digital devices as tools for specific purposes, not as toys for relieving boredom. Hopefully by these means, we can raise up children who will be able to read and appreciate challenging texts, especially the Scriptures, which unfold the gospel of salvation through Christ. Meanwhile, we adults will do well to guard our own minds from the degenerative effects of the digital world. If Wolf is right—and her research seems sound and well-attested—such digital discipline is crucial for Christians who want to grow in their knowledge of God and his truth. View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.