Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
foundling

Artificial Intelligence on the rise?

Recommended Posts

Has anyone thought of the rise of Artificial Intelligence and how it may effect the Church or our lives?

 

It was always something that was bound to happen sooner or later with technology advancing.. It could be a blessing or could very well destroy our lives.. Who knows, it's too early to tell yet,. Go further in time when artificial intelligence is rife in our lives there will be another future intelligence to be worrying over.. It won't end because technology is huge business.

 

I find certain technology amazing.. I wouldn't be without the internet or my smart phone,. I'm always intrigued to visit other websites I haven't visited and speak to random people all over the world, it's also a blessing for a learning tool.., but technology has it's evils, just look at the sex robots that are becoming popular and the damage that can cause Christians in faith.. We should be wise and not foolish with anything in life, including technology..

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

There's already a theory that we are all just a computer program, I'm sure that will become popular eventually like many theories and offshoots of religion have in the past. It's not much different than what the Hindus believe about reality being an illusion, all one has to do is to ask what makes it a fact if fact is illusion, which means they know nothing by their own admission.

 

 

Given enough time robots can replace people in many work fields which would contradict the purpose of the robots since unemployment would mean less sales.

 

I don't really keep an eye on the latest technology, but I don't think it's going to advance that much too soon, and of course there must be a limit to how far technology can advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Has anyone thought of the rise of Artificial Intelligence and how it may effect the Church or our lives?

 

Good question and timely too. With IBM Watson doing everything from "chess" to "healthcare" who knows what's next. I even read the other day that the super computer playing "go" is now teaching itself, not from playing and learning from humans, but from playing against itself. It beat the previous version of itself 100-0 in the first round of games.

 

Robots and AI are likely to take (replace) every job that man doesn't want, either due to danger, repetitive nature, cost, and a whole host of other reasons. Medical diagnosis is an area of big interest to the silicon valley crowd, as is pharmaceuticals. Anywhere a buck of extra profit can be sniffed out, someone has that technology on their radar. Any entrepreneurs out there?

 

What is the economic advantage of AI in the church. If you allow your imagination run free, you might envision an Internet Pastor-Chaplain-Preacher site that serves the 1:1 pastoral needs (anonymously) of all denominations with expert knowledge of scripture and applying God's word to every day problems of modern societies. Is that too far-fetched? I remember reading about someone who said of the first IBM mainframe computers: "there will never be a need for more than 4 or 5 computers" or something to that effect.

 

However, I cannot envision having "fellowship" with an AI-bot. Their IRON might be too sharp for me.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Report: FBI Emails Show Intelligence Community Had Concerns About Steele Dossier

      By Chuck Ross - FBI officials discussed intelligence community concerns about the infamous Steele dossier in a lengthy email thread in October 2016, according to a new report The FBI relied heavily on the dossier to obtain warrants to spy on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page But Republicans have questioned whether the FBI relied on unverified or inaccurate intelligence to obtain the warrants  Justice Department and FBI officials exchanged emails during the late stages of the 2016 presidential campaign discussing concerns within the intelligence community about the infamous Steele dossier, according to a new report. The emails also show that top government officials were aware that Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier, was in contact with reporters regarding his investigation into Donald Trump and his possible links to Russia. The emails, first reported by The Hill, were exchanged in October 2016, before the FBI submitted its first of four applications for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants to spy on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The emails could lend further evidence to Republicans’ allegation that the FBI used information that it knew to be uncorroborated to obtain FISA warrants against Page. The documents could also raise the possibility that the FBI used circular reporting in the FISA applications. That’s because the bureau relied on a news article published by Yahoo on Sept. 23, 2016 in its FISA applications. The application presents the news article as separate from the dossier, even though Steele provided information to the author of the piece, Michael Isikoff. Then-FBI Director James Comey was on the email chain with FBI investigators and officials in the Justice Department’s national security division, according to The Hill. The emails were only recently added to a list of documents that congressional Republicans hope President Trump will declassify. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes first mentioned the documents in a Fox News interview on Nov. 19. “For months, we have been reviewing emails between FBI and DOJ and others that clearly show that they knew of information that should have been presented to the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance] Court. It is real evidence that people within the FBI withheld evidence from the FISA court,” Nunes said. “Even though we know what’s in those emails, a lot of them are still redacted. So they’re still refusing to give Congress even in a classified setting this information.” A congressional source with knowledge of the documents has told The Daily Caller News Foundation that they contain “significant” insight into the FBI’s thinking in the early days of the Russia probe. Nunes and other Republicans previously pressed Trump to declassify and release 21 pages of a June 2017 FISA application taken out against Page. Republicans have also sought the release of FBI notes taken in interviews used for the FISA applications, as well as notes taken during interviews with Bruce Ohr, a Justice Department official who served as a back channel to Steele. The FBI relied heavily on the dossier to obtain four FISA warrants against Page. Republicans have accused the bureau of misleading the FISA judges who approved the warrants by providing unverified information from the dossier. Republicans have also seized on the FBI’s failure to identify the client for the dossier as the DNC and Clinton campaign. The FISA applications do note that the dossier appeared to be funded by someone who wanted to derail Trump’s campaign. Steele revealed in London, where he is being sued over the dossier, that he briefed several American reporters in September and October 2016, before the FBI applied for its first FISA against Page. The former MI6 officer listed Yahoo! News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The New Yorker, and CNN as the news outlets he briefed. It is unclear which media contacts FBI officials knew about when they applied for the first FISA. The most significant contact that Steele had was with Michael Isikoff, a veteran reporter with Yahoo! News. Isikoff published, on Sept. 23, 2016, the first article based on Steele’s investigation into Trumpworld. He reported, as Steele alleges in the dossier, that Page had secret meetings in Moscow in July 2016 with Igor Sechin and Igor Diveykin, two sanctioned Kremlin insiders. Page has vehemently denied meeting with either man. The FBI relied heavily on Steele’s allegation about Page’s Moscow activities. The FISA applications also cite Isikoff’s report, though the FBI inaccurately asserted that investigators did not believe that Steele had provided information to Isikoff. Soon after obtaining the first FISA, the FBI cut ties with Steele over his contacts with David Corn, a reporter at Mother Jones who published an article anonymously quoting Steele on Oct. 31, 2016. It is also not clear whether Steele told the FBI about all of his media contacts. In a footnote to its June 2017 FISA application, the FBI notes that Steele told the FBI that he only provided information from his research to the bureau and his business associate, presumably Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson. Much of the rest of the footnote is redacted, making it impossible to know what else the FBI wrote about Steele’s interactions with reporters. But the FBI did state in the application that the bureau “does not believe that [Steele] directly provided this information to the identified news organization that published the September 23rd News Article.” There is already ample evidence that the FBI, and even Steele and Fusion GPS, had not verified much of the information in the dossier. An internal FBI assessment expressed “medium confidence” in Steele’s work. Steele himself has reportedly told associates that he was only “fifty-fifty” certain that the dossier’s most explosive claim — that a video exists of Donald Trump using prostitutes in a Moscow hotel room — actually exists. And Glenn Simpson, the founder of Fusion GPS, had doubts about Sergei Millian, a Belarus-born businessman who is believed to be a major source for the dossier. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] Report: FBI Emails Show Intelligence Community Had Concerns About Steele Dossier is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • FBI Refuses To Disclose If It Met with Intelligence Community Inspector General Over Clinton Server

      By DCNF - The FBI refuses to disclose whether or not it met with senior members of the Intelligence Community Inspector General on the subject of foreign intrusion of former Secretary Hillary Clinton’s private server. FBI Refuses To Disclose If It Met with Intelligence Community Inspector General Over Clinton Server is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • China Leaving US Behind on Artificial Intelligence: Air Force General

      China's massive investment in artificial intelligence technologies may soon leave the U.S. at a major disadvantage. View the full article

      in Military

    • Putin Claims U.S. Intelligence Agents Funneled $400 Million To Clinton Campaign

      Vladimir Putin made a bombshell claim during Monday's joint press conference with President Trump in Helsinki, Finland, when the Russian President said some $400 million in illegally earned profits was funneled to the Clinton campaign by associates of American-born British financier Bill Browder - at one time the largest foreign portfolio investors in Russia. The scheme involved members of the U.S. intelligence community, said Putin, who he said "accompanied and guided these transactions."   Browder made billions in Russia during the 90's. In December, a Moscow court sentenced Browder in absentia to nine years in prison for tax fraud, while he was also found guilty of tax evasion in a separate 2013 case. Putin accused Browder's associates of illegally earning over than $1.5 billion without paying Russian taxes, before sending $400 million to Clinton.   Read more: Putin Claims U.S. Intelligence Agents Funneled $400 Million To Clinton Campaign WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM "It might have been legal, the contribution itself but the way the money was earned was illegal"  

      in Political Conservative News

    • Artificial insemination.

      I was curious to see what other members might think about it.   To me it seems wrong for a few reasons.   The woman is having the child of a man she's not married to.   ​​​​​​Children are considered as eggs that people keep for later, as if have a child is like getting a pet.   People discard the eggs if their marriage fails or they just deside they don't want children, abortion.   ​​​​​​It seems for the most part the whole thing is playing a game with life. Not trying to unempathetic to couples who can't conseave, but it seems like if they can't then their not really supposed to.   What do think?

      in Off Topic Discussion

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.