Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
markwsmith

One question no atheist can answer

Recommended Posts

Science itself proves that man is a hybrid, body and soul, but to avoid religious terms I will say body (physical) and person (spiritual)

science due to the 5 senses proves the body is knowable by these senses and that the body changes, but the person is not knowable by the 5 senses and does not change, I am the same person all my life! Therefire man is a hybrid! The source of the body is the natural conception of man and woman! WHAT is the source of your person???

It's not physical so it must be spiritual! Since you did not exist at one time, the only logical conclusion is that you were created, therefore there must be a creator!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Atheists cannot answer where the information bearing properties of DNA come from.

Edited by CDF47
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post

The brain is like a piano, it requires a player (spirit). This is something that secular neruo scientists discovered no less, so there is no bias whatsoever, pure science.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

I like how you say "atheists" can not answer when in fact it is science that can not answer.

The atheist has no burden to answer anything. Yet somehow, the believer can not comprehend such a concept.

 

There need not be a creator to logically conclude that we exist. Self awareness should be understood to be the product of time. Reality as we perceive it consists of spacetime. Though consciousness is not fully understood, we know enough to understand that "being" is also a product of spacetime and required for us to exist.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Science itself proves that man is a hybrid, body and soul,

No it doesn’t. The soul has not been proven. 

but to avoid religious terms I will say body (physical) and person (spiritual) 

science due to the 5 senses proves the body is knowable by these senses and that the body changes, but the person is not knowable by the 5 senses and does not change,

if by “person” you mean the mind, yes it does.

I am the same person all my life!

Really? That’s sad.

Therefire man is a hybrid! The source of the body is the natural conception of man and woman!

What has sex got to do with neurology?

...besides that!

WHAT is the source of your person???

Neurology.

It's not physical so it must be spiritual!

Wrong! the very web page you’re reading this second is neither spiritual nor physical. the letters you are looking at right now do not physically exist and will cease to be as soon as you turn this machine off or go to another page.

 

Nor does it have anything to do with gods or angels or pixies or genies or anything like that. this is not magic.

 

What you are looking at is SOFTWARE. 

Since you did not exist at one time, the only logical conclusion is that you were created, therefore there must be a creator!

Mum & Dad. 

 

Honestly, if you’re gonna try to stump Atheists with questions you think we can’t answer (which by the way doesn’t work but never mind that for now) at least pick things that don’t make you look uneducated. 

Do I actually need to explain how sex and birth work?

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Thoran said:

Science itself proves that man is a hybrid, body and soul,

No it doesn’t. The soul has not been proven. 

but to avoid religious terms I will say body (physical) and person (spiritual) 

science due to the 5 senses proves the body is knowable by these senses and that the body changes, but the person is not knowable by the 5 senses and does not change,

if by “person” you mean the mind, yes it does.

I am the same person all my life!

Really? That’s sad.

Therefire man is a hybrid! The source of the body is the natural conception of man and woman!

What has sex got to do with neurology?

...besides that!

WHAT is the source of your person???

Neurology.

It's not physical so it must be spiritual!

Wrong! the very web page you’re reading this second is neither spiritual nor physical. the letters you are looking at right now do not physically exist and will cease to be as soon as you turn this machine off or go to another page.

 

Nor does it have anything to do with gods or angels or pixies or genies or anything like that. this is not magic.

 

What you are looking at is SOFTWARE. 

Since you did not exist at one time, the only logical conclusion is that you were created, therefore there must be a creator!

Mum & Dad. 

 

Honestly, if you’re gonna try to stump Atheists with questions you think we can’t answer (which by the way doesn’t work but never mind that for now) at least pick things that don’t make you look uneducated. 

Do I actually need to explain how sex and birth work?

One question you can't answer is where do the information bearing properties of DNA come from?

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
3 hours ago, Thoran said:

Science itself proves that man is a hybrid, body and soul,

No it doesn’t. The soul has not been proven.... .

 

Honestly, if you’re gonna try to stump Atheists with questions you think we can’t answer (which by the way doesn’t work but never mind that for now) at least pick things that don’t make you look uneducated. 

Though I don't care for these discussions may I ask you to define the soul and person?

 

Also you are throwing around a term "science" as if some kind of magical process performs by itself. Is science self-sufficient and capable of reason as a foundational starting point from which we may utilize logic?

 

Please, by all means list some scientist and their works that have looked for a soul and come up empty handed. I often hear the term science thrown around but I am more interested in the scientist that have studied such subject and have come to the conclusion which you're stating as atheists. I'd also like to know the scientific method or process scientists utilized to come up empty handed. Exactly what are scientist looking for when you suggest that the soul hasn't been proven? Are scientist looking for some kind of an invisible man in a room somewhere in the body?

 

I can hear them now 🤣 there is no room in the body for an invisible soul!

 

3 hours ago, Thoran said:

but to avoid religious terms I will say body (physical) and person (spiritual) 

science due to the 5 senses proves the body is knowable by these senses and that the body changes, but the person is not knowable by the 5 senses and does not change,

if by “person” you mean the mind, yes it does.

Empirical senses are not our sole source of knowledge. For example, knowledge can be formed through introspection. Can we acquire knowledge about our "person" through introspection and our knowledge of the person changes, thus the rational thought of said person changes. We may also acquire knowledge through relations and even propositional facts but that's besides the point.

 

3 hours ago, Thoran said:

Wrong! the very web page you’re reading this second is neither spiritual nor physical. the letters you are looking at right now do not physically exist and will cease to be as soon as you turn this machine off or go to another page.

 

Nor does it have anything to do with gods or angels or pixies or genies or anything like that. this is not magic.

 

What you are looking at is SOFTWARE. 

 

Please name one machine that was not created by a creator or a piece of software not programmed by a programmer.

 

3 hours ago, Thoran said:

Since you did not exist at one time, the only logical conclusion is that you were created, therefore there must be a creator!

Mum & Dad. 

You keep pointing to creation or in this case to both your parents which too are created beings. Are humans infinite or immortal therefore existing eternally or was there a beginning or point in time when the creation or humans came into existence?

 

We are working from a point or foundation in which a Creator is the uncaused first cause (He who causes to become). From there believers may establish rationale, logic, intelligence etc and even come to the conclusion that the Creator invites everyone to rationally investigate the universe or all creation. Without rational thought, logic, intelligence etc I suppose in your above analogies over time computers or machines magically put themselves together and so did the software?

 

Now lemme ask you a question. Do the presuppositions of an atheist affect the science applied to any evidence which is observed, tested and repeated? I mean, for example, an atheist and believer can both observe the same piece of evidence and come to quite different conclusions and narrations. Why is that?

 

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • House Oversight Set To Drag Wilbur Ross In Front Of Congress Over Citizenship Question

      By Evie Fordham - The House Oversight Committee will question Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in March about a citizenship question he supported adding back to the 2020 census, the committee announced Tuesday. The announcement from the committee, which is headed by Democratic Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, comes less than a week after a federal judge ordered the removal of the question Jan. 15. U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman said that Ross’s department violated federal law by including a citizenship question. Ross is scheduled to testify voluntarily on March 14, nearly a year after members of the committee began requesting documents from him, according to a committee press release. Some critics of returning to asking a citizenship question on the census questionnaire say that it could “lead to a significant undercount of immigrants fearful of revealing their citizenship status,” according to The Wall Street Journal. However, the fight to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire will likely be fast-tracked to the U.S. Supreme Court. The issue is urgent because the Census Bureau must finish up the questionnaire by June. Furman also accused Ross of hiding his motives for adding a citizenship question in the Jan. 15 decision. Congressional Democrats are also expected to investigate former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker in for questioning as well, reported The WSJ. Democratic Sens. Kamala Harris of California and Tom Carper of Delaware introduced a bill during the 115th Congress on July 31 to counter the Trump administration’s citizenship question. Their bill, the Census Equality Act, would have required the decennial census and American Community Survey to collect data on citizens’ sexual orientation and gender identity. It did not pass the Senate, and the legislation actually worried some LGBT advocates who did not see an advantage to compiling that kind of data on people who fall under the LGBT umbrella. NPR reported: Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] House Oversight Set To Drag Wilbur Ross In Front Of Congress Over Citizenship Question is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Trump Administration Will Ask The Supreme Court To Protect The Census Citizenship Question

      By Kevin Daley - The Trump administration will ask the Supreme Court to decide whether the government can append a citizenship question to the 2020 census questionnaire, the Department of Justice said Tuesday. U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman forbade the government from incorporating the citizenship question on Jan. 15 in a sweeping decision that ran almost 300 pages. At the administration’s bidding, the Court agreed to review a separate question arising from the citizenship case in December. After Furman issued his decision, the plaintiffs asked the justices to dismiss that case. The Department of Justice responded to that request in court filings on Tuesday, revealing they planned to appeal Furman’s decision in full directly to the high court. “The government intends to file forthwith a petition…to review the district court’s January 15, 2019 opinion and order vacating and enjoining the reinstatement of the citizenship question to the 2020 decennial census,” Solicitor General Noel Francisco wrote. Francisco emphasized the pressing time constraints at hand: the government must finalize the census questionnaire by June, which is not enough time for the ordinary appellate process to play out. “It is exceedingly unlikely that there is sufficient time for review in both the court of appeals and in this Court by that deadline,” Francisco wrote. Therefore, he continued, granting the administration’s request to hear the case now “is likely the only way to protect this Court’s opportunity for review.” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross issued orders providing for the addition of a citizenship question to the census survey in March 2018. The Department of Commerce oversees the Census Bureau. Tuesday’s filing from the government is the latest in a succession of cases in which the Trump administration has short-circuited normal judicial process and asked the Supreme Court to review a district court decision before a federal appeals court does. Those requests, called petitions for certiorari before judgment, are rarely granted. A sprawling coalition of civil rights groups, city governments, and blue states filed lawsuits challenging the citizenship question’s inclusion in April 2019. Those plaintiffs warn the citizenship question will reduce minority participation in the census. As such, the plaintiffs say they stand to lose federal funds and representation in Congress. The Constitution mandates a census every 10 years to apportion seats in the House of Representatives among the states. Population is also used as a basis for rewarding federal aid. A citizenship question was included in the census until 1960. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] Trump Administration Will Ask The Supreme Court To Protect The Census Citizenship Question is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Poll Question: The Rich man and Lazarus Parable or Not?

      Is the story of the Rich man and Lazarus a parable and does it really make a difference?  Wouldn't the story still teach the same truths even if is a parable?   John Calvin held the view that it is not a parable but he also states "But that is of little consequence, provided that the reader comprehends the doctrine which it contains."

      in Bible Study

    • Federal Judge Orders Removal Of Citizenship Question From 2020 Census

      By Kevin Daley - A federal judge in New York barred the Trump administration from including a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire. The decision appears to have significant implications for a related matter the Supreme Court is poised to decide in the spring. “The attempts by the Trump administration to mandate a question about citizenship were not rooted in a desire to strengthen the census process and would only undermine our immigrant communities,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. “Inciting fear in our residents is not only immoral, but also ill-conceived.” The Constitution mandates a census every ten years to apportion seats in the House of Representatives among the states. Population is also used as a basis for rewarding federal aid. A coalition of Democratic cities, states, and interest groups challenged the addition of a citizenship question to the census questionnaire in April 2018, warning it would discourage minority participation. An incomplete survey of minority populations, the plaintiffs feared, would result in diminished federal funds and congressional representation for urban areas. The plaintiffs charged that the addition of the citizenship question violated the Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), a federal law establishing protocols for the issuance of regulations. In his Tuesday decision, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman accepted the plaintiffs’ APA claims while rejecting their constitutional arguments. “[Ross] failed to consider several important aspects of the problem; alternately ignored, cherry-picked, or badly misconstrued the evidence in the record before him; acted irrationally both in light of that evidence and his own stated decisional criteria; and failed to justify significant departures from past policies and practices — a veritable smorgasbord of classic, clear-cut APA violations,” Furman wrote. Elsewhere in the decision, Furman said Ross was not truthful about his motives for adding a citizenship question. Though the secretary initially said publicly that the question was added at the request of the Department of Justice, subsequent evidence showed Ross discussed the matter with White House aides far earlier than initially understood. “Finally, and perhaps most egregiously, the evidence is clear that Secretary Ross’s rationale was pretextual — that is, that the real reason for his decision was something other than the sole reason he put forward in his memorandum,” Furman wrote. Former President Barack Obama elevated Furman to the federal bench in 2012. The plaintiffs sought a deposition from Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross at a previous phase of the litigation. The Department of Commerce oversees the Census Bureau, and Ross himself authorized the addition of the citizenship question. Though Furman authorized the Ross deposition, the Supreme Court intervened to stop it in October 2018. Shortly thereafter in November 2018, the high court agreed to decide what evidence Furman could rely upon when making his decision. When plaintiffs challenge agency action in court, the agency itself generally turns over the body of documents and evidence it relied upon to make its decision. Those writings are called the administrative record. In most cases of this nature, the court will make its decision based only on the administrative record. However, Furman allowed the plaintiffs to gather evidence beyond the administrative record to challenge the citizenship question. The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether that decision was correct. The Justice Department may appeal Furman’s decision. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] Federal Judge Orders Removal Of Citizenship Question From 2020 Census is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Ark Encounter Founder Offers Free Admission to Public Schools after Atheist Group Threatens to Sue Schools Who Visit it

      The Wisconsin-based atheist group, Freedom From Religion Foundation, warned public schools not to take their students to the Creation Museum or the Ark Encounter Park because of their “overtly religious atmosphere.” View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.