Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
David Lee

Nashville Statement on Biblical Sexuality

Recommended Posts

59a5d1841e00003c00a74c43-e1504061544218.png?w=689

 

“Know that the LORD Himself is God;

It is He who has made us, and not we ourselves…”

-Psalm 100:3

 

Preamble

Evangelical Christians at the dawn of the twenty-first century find themselves living in a period

of historic transition. As Western culture has become increasingly post-Christian, it has

embarked upon a massive revision of what it means to be a human being. By and large the spirit

of our age no longer discerns or delights in the beauty of God’s design for human life. Many

deny that God created human beings for his glory, and that his good purposes for us include our

personal and physical design as male and female. It is common to think that human identity as

male and female is not part of God’s beautiful plan, but is, rather, an expression of an

individual’s autonomous preferences. The pathway to full and lasting joy through God’s good

design for his creatures is thus replaced by the path of shortsighted alternatives that, sooner or

later, ruin human life and dishonor God.

 

This secular spirit of our age presents a great challenge to the Christian church. Will the church

of the Lord Jesus Christ lose her biblical conviction, clarity, and courage, and blend into the

spirit of the age? Or will she hold fast to the word of life, draw courage from Jesus, and

unashamedly proclaim his way as the way of life? Will she maintain her clear, counter-cultural

witness to a world that seems bent on ruin?

 

We are persuaded that faithfulness in our generation means declaring once again the true story of

the world and of our place in it—particularly as male and female. Christian Scripture teaches that

there is but one God who alone is Creator and Lord of all. To him alone, every person owes gladhearted

thanksgiving, heart-felt praise, and total allegiance. This is the path not only of glorifying

God, but of knowing ourselves. To forget our Creator is to forget who we are, for he made us for

himself. And we cannot know ourselves truly without truly knowing him who made us. We did

not make ourselves. We are not our own. Our true identity, as male and female persons, is given

by God. It is not only foolish, but hopeless, to try to make ourselves what God did not create us

to be.

 

We believe that God’s design for his creation and his way of salvation serve to bring him the

greatest glory and bring us the greatest good. God’s good plan provides us with the greatest

freedom. Jesus said he came that we might have life and have it in overflowing measure. He is

for us and not against us. Therefore, in the hope of serving Christ’s church and witnessing

publicly to the good purposes of God for human sexuality revealed in Christian Scripture, we

offer the following affirmations and denials.

 

Article 1

WE AFFIRM that God has designed marriage to be a covenantal, sexual, procreative, lifelong

union of one man and one woman, as husband and wife, and is meant to signify the covenant

love between Christ and his bride the church.

 

WE DENY that God has designed marriage to be a homosexual, polygamous, or polyamorous

relationship. We also deny that marriage is a mere human contract rather than a covenant made

before God.

 

Article 2

WE AFFIRM that God’s revealed will for all people is chastity outside of marriage and fidelity

within marriage.

 

WE DENY that any affections, desires, or commitments ever justify sexual intercourse before or

outside marriage; nor do they justify any form of sexual immorality.

 

Article 3

WE AFFIRM that God created Adam and Eve, the first human beings, in his own image, equal

before God as persons, and distinct as male and female.

 

WE DENY that the divinely ordained differences between male and female render them unequal

in dignity or worth.

 

Article 4

WE AFFIRM that divinely ordained differences between male and female reflect God’s original

creation design and are meant for human good and human flourishing.

 

WE DENY that such differences are a result of the Fall or are a tragedy to be overcome.

 

Article 5

WE AFFIRM that the differences between male and female reproductive structures are integral

to God’s design for self-conception as male or female.

 

WE DENY that physical anomalies or psychological conditions nullify the God-appointed link

between biological sex and self-conception as male or female.

 

Article 6

WE AFFIRM that those born with a physical disorder of sex development are created in the

image of God and have dignity and worth equal to all other image-bearers. They are

acknowledged by our Lord Jesus in his words about “eunuchs who were born that way from their

mother's womb.” With all others they are welcome as faithful followers of Jesus Christ and

should embrace their biological sex insofar as it may be known.

 

WE DENY that ambiguities related to a person’s biological sex render one incapable of living a

fruitful life in joyful obedience to Christ.

 

Article 7

WE AFFIRM that self-conception as male or female should be defined by God’s holy purposes

in creation and redemption as revealed in Scripture.

 

WE DENY that adopting a homosexual or transgender self-conception is consistent with God’s

holy purposes in creation and redemption.

 

Article 8

WE AFFIRM that people who experience sexual attraction for the same sex may live a rich and

fruitful life pleasing to God through faith in Jesus Christ, as they, like all Christians, walk in

purity of life.

 

WE DENY that sexual attraction for the same sex is part of the natural goodness of God’s

original creation, or that it puts a person outside the hope of the gospel.

 

Article 9

WE AFFIRM that sin distorts sexual desires by directing them away from the marriage covenant

and toward sexual immorality— a distortion that includes both heterosexual and homosexual

immorality.

 

WE DENY that an enduring pattern of desire for sexual immorality justifies sexually immoral

behavior.

 

Article 10

WE AFFIRM that it is sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism and that

such approval constitutes an essential departure from Christian faithfulness and witness.

 

WE DENY that the approval of homosexual immorality or transgenderism is a matter of moral

indifference about which otherwise faithful Christians should agree to disagree.

 

Article 11

WE AFFIRM our duty to speak the truth in love at all times, including when we speak to or

about one another as male or female.

 

WE DENY any obligation to speak in such ways that dishonor God’s design of his imagebearers

as male and female.

 

Article 12

WE AFFIRM that the grace of God in Christ gives both merciful pardon and transforming

power, and that this pardon and power enable a follower of Jesus to put to death sinful desires

and to walk in a manner worthy of the Lord.

 

WE DENY that the grace of God in Christ is insufficient to forgive all sexual sins and to give

power for holiness to every believer who feels drawn into sexual sin.

 

Article 13

WE AFFIRM that the grace of God in Christ enables sinners to forsake transgender selfconceptions

and by divine forbearance to accept the God-ordained link between one’s biological

sex and one’s self-conception as male or female.

 

WE DENY that the grace of God in Christ sanctions self-conceptions that are at odds with God’s

revealed will.

 

Article 14

WE AFFIRM that Christ Jesus has come into the world to save sinners and that through Christ’s

death and resurrection forgiveness of sins and eternal life are available to every person who

repents of sin and trusts in Christ alone as Savior, Lord, and supreme treasure.

 

WE DENY that the Lord’s arm is too short to save or that any sinner is beyond his reach.

Initial Signatories

page 1 only

Institutional affiliation for identification purposes only

Denny Burk

President, Council on Biblical

Manhood and Womanhood

 

John Piper

Founder & Teacher, Desiring God

Chancellor, Bethlehem Seminary and

College

 

James Dobson

Founder, Focus on the Family

 

Russell Moore

President, Ethics & Religious Liberty

Commission

 

J. I. Packer

Professor of Theology, Regent College

 

Wayne Grudem

Research Professor of Theology

and Biblical Studies, Phoenix

Seminary

 

R. Albert Mohler, Jr.

President, The Southern Baptist

Theological Seminary

 

Tony Perkins

President, Family Research Council

 

D. A. Carson

Research Professor of New

Testament, Trinity Evangelical

Divinity School

 

John MacArthur

Pastor, Grace Community Church

President, The Master’s Seminary and

College

 

Sam Allberry

Speaker & Apologist, Ravi Zacharias

International Ministries

 

R. C. Sproul

Founder & Chairman, Ligonier

Ministries

 

Rosaria Butterfield

Author of The Secret Thoughts of an

Unlikely Convert

 

Francis Chan

Author & Pastor, We Are Church

 

Marvin Olasky

Editor in Chief, World Magazine

 

Ligon Duncan

Chancellor & CEO, Reformed

Theological Seminary

 

Steve Gaines

President, The Southern Baptist

Convention

Pastor, Bellevue Baptist Church

 

Andrew T. Walker

Director of Policy Studies, Ethics

& Religious Liberty Commission

 

H. B. Charles, Jr.

Pastor, Shiloh Metropolitan Baptist

Church

 

Christopher Yuan

Speaker & Author, Moody Bible

Institute

 

Dennis Rainey

Founder & Former President,

FamilyLife

 

Frank Page

President & CEO, Southern Baptist

Convention Executive Committee

Former SBC President

 

Nancy DeMoss Wolgemuth

Author & Speaker, Revive Our Hearts

 

Daniel L. Akin

President, Southeastern Baptist

Theological Seminary

 

Kevin DeYoung

Senior Pastor, Christ Covenant Church

 

Alistair Begg

Reverend, Parkside Church

 

Heath Lambert

Executive Director, Association of

Certified Biblical Counselors

 

Jerry A. Johnson

President & CEO, National Religious

Broadcasters

 

Mark Dever

Pastor, Capitol Hill Baptist Church

 

Randy Alcorn

Director, Eternal Perspectives

Ministries

 

Karen Swallow Prior

Professor of English, Liberty

University

 

Matt Chandler

Pastor, The Village Church

 

Fred Luter

Senior Pastor, Franklin Avenue

Baptist Church

Former SBC President

 

James MacDonald

Founder and Senior Pastor, Harvest

Bible Chapel

Former SBC President

 

James Merritt

Pastor, Cross Pointe Church

 

Jack Graham

Pastor, Prestonwood Baptist

Church

 

~https://cbmw.org/nashville-statement/

 

 

 

--David

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post

I think before one chooses a church they ought to ask the pastor and/or other leaders what they think of this statement. The same holds true for the current church one is attending.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post

Good point Faber being there are many denominational identities out there that are turning apostate these days.

 

What do you think of this statement?

I heard the news watching the 700 Club's news broadcast today. I think this is not only necessary but may be a preamble to the time when, short in coming I believe, American churches will have to draw a line in the sand. They'll have to determine for themselves that there is a separation clause in the Constitution. And it begins with rescinding their 501©3 tax exempt status via the IRS.

 

Next, they'll have to actively spon$or measures, and prayerfully under this current Christian, GBH, president, so as to designate marriage as a religions institution. And civil union as that which non-Christians and homosexuals may enter in. This way churches won't eventually be forced to accept homosexuals being they have the 501©3 exemption and as such are subject in likelihood in future to have to concede or be prosecuted. Because anyone or any entity that typically has any federal funding or sponsorship at all, like tax exemptions, are subject to upholding civil rights laws. And respecting "protected class". Which homosexuals are considered to be. (Protected Class). So too are the religious .

 

In any case, there is a spiritual war going on in the world today. It will come a day when the wheat and the chaff will appear on the winds or on the ground. Pick a side time. And while it is easy to say, "GOD'S" now, apostate denominations today show us that for some it is easy to choose to walk away from our Lord. But as with those apostles who were with Jesus for a time and then went their own way, it was said of them, they did so because they were not one with us.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

The Nashville Statement simply affirms God's expression in the Bible regarding sexuality. I appreciate that the statement declares all sexual behavior outside of marriage to be sin. I appreciate that it affirms marriage as between one woman and one man. These are building block statements to a healthy society.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
The Nashville Statement simply affirms God's expression in the Bible regarding sexuality. I appreciate that the statement declares all sexual behavior outside of marriage to be sin. I appreciate that it affirms marriage as between one woman and one man. These are building block statements to a healthy society.

And to think, 30 years ago maybe less this statement would never have been a thing. Not even conceived of in a Christian mind because it simply is as God planned it.

 

Now, the world is fast becoming Sodom and Gomorrah by law. Because law makers are afraid of domestic threat that is the homosexual and Tranny lobby.

Recently, as in this morning, on "Today", Bradley Manning, the traitor who had 30 years yet to serve in federal prison but was pardoned by Muslim in chief Barack, had his Harvard scholarship revoked. Harvard apologized. But didn't reinstate to my knowledge.

Oh, goodness, you revoked his scholarship after he betrayed America? Mighty kind!

But you apologized. Mighty gutless.

 

That's the new world order now. The perverse inmates through terrorism are getting to run the assylum.

 

That's why this Nashville statement did become necessary in these times.

 

Within less than 10 years the bible will be considered hate speech and outlawed. Watch.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

Resurrecting this thread to comment on the last sentence there. That deserves an "over my dead body." We need to keep that from happening, and we won't succeed by pretending there isn't a movement afoot to ban the Bible.

 

It's satan's oldest trick.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Ron Swanson Teaches Seminar On Biblical Manhood

      PAWNEE, IN—Pawnee Third Baptist Church hosted its annual Xtreme Men Living Xtremely for Christ to the Extreme (XMLXFCTTX) last weekend, and this time, the church managed to get the perfect speaker to teach the lesson on living like a true biblical macho man: Ron Swanson. The post Ron Swanson Teaches Seminar On Biblical Manhood appeared first on The Babylon Bee. View the original full article

      in Christian Satire

    • Colorado Civil Rights Commission Updates Mission Statement To Simply Read 'Destroy Jack Phillips'

      DENVER, CO—In a change designed to make their mission more transparent to Colorado citizens, the state's Civil Rights Commission updated its mission statement Thursday to read simply "DESTROY JACK PHILLIPS." The post Colorado Civil Rights Commission Updates Mission Statement To Simply Read 'Destroy Jack Phillips' appeared first on The Babylon Bee. View the original full article

      in Christian Satire

    • Is Annihilationism Biblical?

      The bible distinctly teaches that immortality is a gift given to the elect only, the bible repeatedly describes the wicked as being destroyed, burned up, and killed (souls included), and the bible demonstrates the nature of God’s wrath against unrighteousness by unleashing it unto Jesus in the form of physical death after momentary spiritual separation, and not eternal conscious torment.   But nearly all churches teach differently. The modern day church teaches that everyone has eternal life and that the wicked will continue on for forever. This view that those who burn in hell burn for all eternity is called Eternal Conscious Torment (ECT), or Unconditional Immortality.   Let's see what the bible really has to say...           Point 1: ​ The bible specifically states more than 34 times throughout scripture that immortality is given as a gift to the righteous only. In Genesis, God casts Adam and Eve out of the garden specifically to protect them from the curse of immortality.   1 John 3:15; Mark 10:17; Mark 10:30; Luke 18:18; John 3:16; John 5:39; John 6:54; John 6:68; John 10:28; John 17:2; John 17:3; Acts 13:48; Romans 2:7; Romans 5:21; Romans 6:23; 1 Timothy 6:19; Titus 1:2; Titus 3:7; 1 John 1:2; 1 John 2:25; 1 John 3:15; 1 John 5:11; 1 John 5:13; 1 John 5:20; Jude 1:21; Genesis 3:22; Revelation 2:7; Revelation 22:2; Revelation 22:14; John 4:14; Revelation 21:6; 1 Corinthians 15:53; 1 Corinthians 15:54; 1 Timothy 6:16           Point 2: ​ The bible expressly states that the wicked shall be destroyed, slaughtered, and burned to ashes repeatedly throughout scripture. Our example of what will happen to the wicked is Sodom, which is no longer burning.   Mathew 10:28; Romans 6:23; James 1:15; 2 Corinthians 7:10; 1 John 5:16; Revelation 20:14; Revelation 21:8; Philippians 3:19; Psalm 145:20; Mathew 7:13; Psalm 68:2; John 3:16; John 10:28; Jude 1:7           Point 3: ​ If the punishment for sin was eternal conscious torment, Jesus must still be dead. Or else his tiny sacrifice of simply death must be meaningless in the face of God’s eternal anger.   Isaiah 53:5-6; John 10:11; 1 Peter 2:24; Mark 10:45; Hebrews 10:9; Romans 3:25; 1 Peter 3:18; Ephesians 5:25; Leviticus 16:10; 1 John 3:16; Deuteronomy 21:22           The supporters of eternal conscious torment use the following passages as core support: ​   1. “ And they shall go out and look on the dead bodies of the men who have rebelled against me. For their worm shall not die, their fire shall not be quenched, and they shall be an abhorrence to all flesh. ” - Isaiah 66:22-24   Ellicot’s Commentary for English Readers Isaiah 66:24 "And they will go out and look on the dead bodies of those who rebelled against me; the worms that eat them will not die, the fire that burns them will not be quenched, and they will be loathsome to all mankind." - “...devoured by worms, or given to the flames. Taken strictly, therefore, the words do not speak of the punishment of the souls of men after death, but of the defeat and destruction upon earth of the enemies of Jehovah…Even so taken, however, with this wider range, it is still a question whether the words are to be taken literally or figuratively (though this, perhaps, is hardly a question), whether the bodies, which represent souls, are thought of as not destroyed, but only tormented, or as consumed to nothing, by the fire and by the worm…”   The commentators are unsure whether or not the worm is literal or figurative. They seem to take the side of ECT, but admit it isn’t clear either way.   The book of Isaiah is known for being the most poetic, figurative book in the Old Testament.   Also,   Quench - the definition of quench verb (used with object)   2. to put out or extinguish (fire, flames, etc.).   3. to cool suddenly by plunging into a liquid, as in tempering steel by immersion in water.           2. “ And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. ” - Daniel 12:1-2   This simply means that their name will forever be held in contempt; that they will never be redeemed. Such as how the people of Sodom are held in contempt even today. 4,000 years later, and most people seem to know that the Sodomites were bad people. Everlasting contempt. The Sodomites will never be redeemed.           3. “It is better for you to enter life crippled or lame than with two hands or two feet to be thrown into the eternal fire.” - Mathew 18:6-9   “In like manner, Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, who indulged in sexual immorality and pursued strange flesh, are on display as an example of those who sustain the punishment of eternal fire.” – Jude 1:7   Sodom is no longer burning, despite having been burned by this eternal fire.           4. " And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life. ” - Mathew 25:31-46   Eternal in result, not in cause. In other words, the death of a human being is eternal (at least if dead for a certain period of time). A dead human will never come back to life. The result of that death lasts forever and ever. But the person isn’t suffering eternal death. The process of death itself is not eternal. It is quick.   Likewise, God’s punishment for the wicked is eternal in result, or in consequence. But certainly not eternal in process, or in action.           5. “ And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever, and they have no rest, day or night, these worshipers of the beast and its image, and whoever receives the mark of its name. ” - Revelation 14:9-11   “ For the LORD has a day of vengeance, A year of recompense for the cause of Zion. Its streams will be turned into pitch, And its loose earth into brimstone, And its land will become burning pitch. It will not be quenched night or day; Its smoke will go up forever. From generation to generation it will be desolate; None will pass through it forever and ever. But pelican and hedgehog will possess it, And owl and raven will dwell in it; And He will stretch over it the line of desolation ” – Isaiah 34:8-11   How can an owl, raven, pelican, and hedgehog dwell in this land if it is burning forever?   Also, the symbolic imagery of “smoke rising from a destroyed city” is not new: “… and he looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah, and toward all the land of the valley, and he saw, and behold, the smoke of the land ascended like the smoke of a furnace. ” – Genesis 19:28. This imagery is a symbol. The prophet Isaiah is best known for being one of the more poetic writers of the bible. Put two and two together and it makes sense that he would use such imagery and it is perfectly reasonable to believe that he is speaking figuratively when he says the smoke will “go up forever and ever”. In other words, he is speaking of the permanent destruction of the city. While the physical smoke may have dissipated, the memory of it will remain forever and ever. It symbolically will continue to rise.   http://rethinkinghell.com/2017/04/a-primer-on-revelation-149-11/           6. “ And the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever." - Revelation 20:10; 14-15   This is talking about the Beast, Devil, and False Prophet. Not humans.   http://www.rethinkinghell.com/2015/12/a-primer-on-revelation-2010/           7. “Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment." - Luke 16:19-31   If this passage is meant to be taken as a literal picture of the end times, and not as a metaphorical parable, as proponents of eternal conscious torment suggest, a plethora of massive problems arise. For example, how can a man in hell speak to a man in heaven like he was face to face, despite the “great chasm” that separates them? Also, how can all the righteous fit into Abraham’s bosom? Also, how can Heaven be anywhere near perfect if all the screams from people being eternally tortured in hell are clearly audible?   It is clear that this passage, while uncharacteristic of most other parables, is not meant to be taken as a literal picture of the end times.           Conclusion: ​ The bible distinctly teaches that immortality is a gift given to the elect only, the bible repeatedly describes the wicked as being destroyed, burned up, and killed (souls included), and the bible demonstrates the nature of God’s wrath against unrighteousness by unleashing it unto Jesus in the form of physical death after momentary spiritual separation, and not eternal conscious torment.   Annihilationism is therefore...biblical.  

      in Theological Debate

    • Mary: the biblical woman behind the cultural legend

      What does the Bible tell us about Mary, the mother of Jesus?   More...

      in Bible Study

    • Is There Really No Biblical Support for Unconditional Election?

      Christians have often disagreed over the exact nature of the biblical doctrine of election. Reasonable believers are willing to state their arguments for their views while acknowledging that others, who disagree, have their own, different, arguments. Making a case for and listening to critiques of one’s views while showing perceived deficiencies in opposing views are great ways to strengthen one’s understanding of the Word of God. That is simply the Christian way of engaging brothers who disagree.   Consequently, when a person claims that “the Reformed idea that God chooses some individuals and not others for salvation has no, I repeat, no biblical support,” it is hard to take him seriously. Gratuitous, dismissive assertions have no place in serious theological conversations. Unfortunately, when a respected person makes such a claim some will be tempted to take him at his word.   In order to help those so tempted and to expose the foolishness of such a claim, here are a few of the Bible’s many teachings that highlight God’s sovereign grace in election. I put the key words in bold simply to highlight the precise way that the Bible teaches that God chooses some individuals and not others to salvation.   Matthew 11:25–27 25 At that time Jesus declared, “I thank you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and understanding and revealed them to little children; 26 yes, Father, for such was your gracious will. 27 All things have been handed over to me by my Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal him .” If no one knows the Father (isn’t that salvation?) except those to whom the Son chooses to reveal Him, doesn’t that mean that some are chosen and not others?   John 6:37 37 All that the Father gives me will come to me , and whoever comes to me I will never cast out. Since all do not come to Christ and yet all that the Father gives to Christ will come to Him, doesn’t that mean the Father gave some to Christ and didn’t give others to Christ?   John 17:1–9 1 When Jesus had spoken these words, he lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, “Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son that the Son may glorify you, 2 since you have given him authority over all flesh, to give eternal life to all whom you have given him . 3 And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.…   6 “I have manifested your name to the people whom you gave me out of the world . Yours they were, and you gave them to me , and they have kept your word. 7 Now they know that everything that you have given me is from you. 8 For I have given them the words that you gave me, and they have received them and have come to know in truth that I came from you; and they have believed that you sent me. 9 I am praying for them. I am not praying for the world but for those whom you have given me, for they are yours . Evidently Jesus believed that the Father had given Him people to whom He in turn would give eternal life. Unless you believe that Jesus has given or will give eternal life to every person then you must conclude that God gave Jesus (or we could say “chose”) some people and not others for salvation.   Acts 13:48 48 And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed . How many believed? Only as many as were appointed to eternal life.   Romans 9:9–13 9 For this is what the promise said: “About this time next year I will return, and Sarah shall have a son.” 10 And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad—in order that God’s purpose of election might continue , not because of works but because of him who calls— 12 she was told, “The older will serve the younger.” 13 As it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.” Surely even those who reject personal, unconditional election must admit that God made some sort of distinction between Jacob (whom He “loved”) and Esau (whom He “hated”).   2 Thessalonians 2:13–14 13 But we ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers beloved by the Lord, because God chose you as the firstfruits to be saved , through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth. 14 To this he called you through our gospel, so that you may obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. It was the Thessalonian Christians, not all those living in Thessalonica, whom God chose.   Ephesians 1:4–5 4 even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world , that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love 5 he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will . Who is “us”? Paul and his Christian readers. Those are the ones God chose and predestined to be holy, blameless and adopted.   In light of these clear statements of Scripture it is no wonder the Abstract of Principles of 1858 (the first confession of faith produced by Southern Baptists) affirms unconditional election in Article 5: Election is God’s eternal choice of some persons unto everlasting life—not because of foreseen merit in them, but of His mere mercy in Christ—in consequence of which choice they are called, justified and glorified. This is simply a reflection of what the Bible teaches and of what was widely believed among traditional Southern Baptists at the beginning of the SBC.   Source: http://founders.org/2017/07/06/no_biblical_support_for_unconditional_election/

      in Calvinism

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.