Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
William

The No. 1 Reason Evangelicals Still Put Their Hopes in Trump

Recommended Posts

Staff

The most important day of Donald Trump’s campaign for the presidency was May 18, 2016.

 

On that day, the soon-to-be GOP nominee released the names of 11 judges he would consider nominating to the Supreme Court. The list was put together with input from the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank known for defending traditional marriage, opposing abortion and fighting for the right of religious institutions to follow their conscience on these matters (and others) without government interference.

 

By suggesting that he would appoint conservative justices, and actually naming their names, Trump made huge inroads among evangelical voters. This is because many of Trump’s evangelical supporters are still using the 40-year-old political playbook written by Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and other founders of the so-called Christian right.

 

There is not a lot of nuance or complexity in this playbook. In fact, its approach to presidential politics is quite simple: Vote for the candidate who opposes abortion and will appoint Supreme Court justices who will overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 case that lifted most government-based restrictions on the practice.

 

Though we have heard a lot of talk in the last decade about the Christian right’s steady decline as more younger evangelicals expand their Christian vision of politics to include the alleviation of poverty, the protection of the environment, the fight against slave trafficking and the pursuit of racial reconciliation, their parents still believe abortion, gay marriage, religious freedom and opposition to LGBT rights should be at the center of an evangelical political witness. And the fate of these issues rests on the Supreme Court.

 

This is why prominent evangelicals such as theologian Wayne Grudem, author Eric Metaxas, Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr. and Dallas megachurch pastor Robert Jeffress have told their followers that a vote for Trump is a moral vote.

 

These leaders are urging evangelicals to look beyond Trump’s character flaws and consider the larger ethical picture. If Hillary Clinton is elected, they argue, the Supreme Court will be lost for multiple generations. Roe v. Wade will not be overturned and Christian institutions will be persecuted for upholding traditional beliefs on marriage.

 

In a recent interview, Metaxas could not deny the fact that Trump has said some morally problematic things about women, immigrants, Muslims and the disabled, but he concluded that the New York real estate tycoon was essentially harmless, much like the crazy uncle at family gatherings who does not know when to keep his mouth shut. According to Metaxas, evangelicals should elect crazy Uncle Donald because he has a good heart and will appoint conservative justices.

 

So far Trump’s plan to woo evangelicals appears to be working. According to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, Trump has gained serious ground among evangelicals, earning more support among them than Mitt Romney had four years ago at this point in the election season.

 

The Trump campaign is coming off a pretty bad week that included, among other things, disrespecting the family of an American military hero, failing to understand the relationship between Russia and Ukraine, using a campaign speech to build an argument against his opponent based on a video that did not exist and claiming that the 2016 election was “rigged” against him.

 

The only thing keeping him afloat in these troubled waters is his May 18 announcement about the Supreme Court.

 

But can evangelicals really trust Trump to deliver on his Supreme Court promises? According to the bipartisan website PolitiFact, 85 percent of the claims Trump has made on the campaign trail (or at least the statements PolitiFact checked) are either half true or false. (Compare that with Clinton, at 48 percent).

 

Of course many evangelicals will respond to such an assertion by claiming that at least they have a chance to change the court with Trump. Though he may be a wild card, evangelicals believe that Clinton would be much more predictable. A Clinton presidency would result in a crushing blow to the Christian right’s agenda — perhaps even a knockout punch.

 

So this is where many evangelicals find themselves. They want the Supreme Court so badly they are willing to put their faith and trust in someone who is nearly incapable of telling the truth.

 

Let’s remember that choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil.

 

Source: http://www.christianheadlines.com/co...-in-trump.html

Share this post


Link to post
Metaxas could not deny the fact that Trump has said some morally problematic things about women, immigrants, Muslims and the disabled, but he concluded that the New York real estate tycoon was essentially harmless, much like the crazy uncle at family gatherings who does not know when to keep his mouth shut.

A lot of Germans voters probably felt the same way about Hitler when he was running for office. However I will at least consider voting for Trump.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Evangelist don't have another option but to back Trump because he's the only candidate who openly defends them. The left side hasn't even bothered to hide their hatred for Christian beliefs whether it's marriage or abortion, or even our right to refuse service and not make a cake. If we have four more years of Democrats ruling the white house, I'm not sure Christianity will survive the onslaught of slander and legal binding of our rights to freely practice our beliefs.

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
Evangelist don't have another option but to back Trump because he's the only candidate who openly defends them. The left side hasn't even bothered to hide their hatred for Christian beliefs whether it's marriage or abortion, or even our right to refuse service and not make a cake. If we have four more years of Democrats ruling the white house, I'm not sure Christianity will survive the onslaught of slander and legal binding of our rights to freely practice our beliefs.

 

Oh, we'll survive. Even if we need go underground once again.

  • Matthew 16:18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

God bless,

William

Share this post


Link to post

I am against abortion, but it irritates me that it is THE issue elections hinge on. There are ample problems with Trump and I find his policies to be full of spite and hate. I do not know who I am voting for in this upcoming election because neither primary candidate embodies the type of morality I want to see lead this country. Past elections have been disconcerting, but at times, this one completely terrifies me.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

 

Oh, we'll survive. Even if we need go underground once again.

  • Matthew 16:18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

God bless,

William

 

I meant that we won't be as free as we have been since the Constitution was written. If we have to go underground to have our beliefs, it might make our beliefs strong but it will be harder to openly spread the good news. Not only that but the culture we live in might be become the equivalent to when the Jews lived in Babylon or Egypt.

Share this post


Link to post

Well I think you have a good point, but I also think that you might be putting too much stock into the voters' knowledge. I am just not sure that the majority of them know about the Supreme Court justice that he has said he would appoint. I could very well be wrong, so I am not trying to argue either way here. I am merely just basing my guess here on history and probably my more cynical view of the voting process and voter knowledge. I know that sounds snobbish but that is not my intention (I don't really know a lot about the issues either) but hopefully you get my point. Very interesting though, nonetheless, and thank you for sharing.

Share this post


Link to post

Unless there are some unexpected changes in the future we have no hope of electing a good president. We need to do two things: pray that God will intervene and work on electing good candidates to Congress. A good Congress can provide some restraints on the actions of a bad president.

Share this post


Link to post

If he does get elected, will he actually appoint good justices? Everything he has said along the election campaign has been quite vague, as are most of his policies, or flat out ignorant and full of hate. This is not a man that lives by Christian standards and I think it is important to realize that. I think what people are doing is filling in the gaps - if he is vague, he MUST agree with what I think! This is dangerous.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Trump, Palin, Ocasio-Cortez Face Off In Lowest-Scoring 'Celebrity Jeopardy!' Episode In History

      U.S.—On a special Celebrity Jeopardy! event aired Wednesday night, President Donald Trump, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and former Alaska governor Sarah Palin broke all records for the lowest-scoring Jeopardy! game in history. The post Trump, Palin, Ocasio-Cortez Face Off In Lowest-Scoring 'Celebrity Jeopardy!' Episode In History appeared first on The Babylon Bee. View the original full article

      in Christian Satire

    • President Trump wall

      Have you come to any opinion on the wall? I have and I am totally convinced we must have the wall for our borders. But we hear a lot on our southern border, I have been told the border between us and Canada has problems as well. Any thoughts?

      in Morality and Laws

    • Trump invites members of both parties to discuss border funding impasse – not everyone showed up

      By R. Mitchell - President Donald Trump invited Democrats and Republicans to lunch Tuesday to negotiate a compromise that would secure the southern border and re-open the federal government, but, according to the White House, it was a one-sided affair. “As Senator Schumer and Speaker Pelosi refuse to negotiate, President Donald J. Trump and his team are working hard to find solutions to solve the humanitarian and national security crisis at the border and reopen the government,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement. “Today, the President offered both Democrats and Republicans the chance to meet for lunch at the White House. Unfortunately, no Democrats will attend.” The White House released the names of those who showed up to work on re-opening the government, and it’s as lopsided as Sanders said: Trump has a compromise ready for congressional consideration, but he needs at least 6 Democrats to put America’s security, the safety of our border agents and the financial well-being of furloughed government workers ahead of their ‘stop Trump at all costs’ agenda. “The President has a proposal on the table that includes additional technology at ports of entry, allows minors from Central America to seek asylum in their home country, and physical barriers between ports of entry made of steel instead of concrete,” Sanders said. “The President looks forward to having a working lunch with House Republicans to solve the border crisis and reopen the government. It’s time for the Democrats to come to the table and make a deal.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have cast aside the pleas of border patrol agents and leadership to fund the border barriers they say they desperately need to do their work safely and effectively. By not even bothering to show up to a good faith negotiation, Chuck, Nancy and the Democrats have proven that this isn’t a common sense approach to national security – it’s just politics. Content created by Conservative Daily News is available for re-publication without charge under the Creative Commons license. Visit our syndication page for details. Trump invites members of both parties to discuss border funding impasse – not everyone showed up is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • 19-Year-Old State Lawmaker Makes Trump An Offer To Fund The Border Wall

      By Evie Fordham - West Virginia House of Delegates member Caleb Hanna wants to fund a southern border wall with $10 million of his state’s surplus to combat West Virginia’s drug problem, he said on “Fox and Friends” Tuesday. “West Virginia has a terrible drug problem,” Hanna said Tuesday. “I believe that a lot of those drugs and opioids are coming directly from the southern border. I spoke to local and state law enforcement, and they say these drugs are so pure they can’t be coming from anywhere other than Mexico. So I believe that the wall is a crucial part in addressing West Virginia’s drug problem.” Hanna and his fellow Republican delegates Carl “Robbie” Martin and Patrick Martin plan to introduce the bill that would transfer $10 million of the state’s $185 million surplus to the border wall that President Donald Trump has proposed, reported The Mountaineer Journal. The state surplus funds would not make much of a dent in the wall fund, though — Trump is asking for more than $5 billion. “So, the West Virginia Republican majority in the House has been very supportive of President Trump and his efforts to secure the southern border,” Hanna said. “So, I am happy to co-sponsor a piece of legislation that I don’t think just West Virginia will be happy about, but the American people as a whole.” West Virginia had the highest drug overdose death rate in 2017, surpassing other states struggling with the opioid crisis including Ohio and Pennsylvania, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The state has struggled to combat an addiction epidemic fueled by illicit substances as well as an influx of prescription opioids. Hanna, 19, is the nation’s youngest black lawmaker and was elected to West Virginia’s House of Delegates District 44 in November after defeating Democratic incumbent Dana Lynch. “I always knew that I was not satisfied with the leadership I was getting within my own house district,” Hanna told The Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview Thursday. “I told myself if I ever had my opportunity to take that, I would give it my shot.” Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] 19-Year-Old State Lawmaker Makes Trump An Offer To Fund The Border Wall is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Unspeakably Evil: Trump Feeds Kids

      Un. Be. Lievable. The post Unspeakably Evil: Trump Feeds Kids appeared first on The Babylon Bee. View the original full article

      in Christian Satire

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.