Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
William

Papal Schism

Recommended Posts

Staff
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

I watched a few minutes of this but there was nothing new and the delivery was boring.

 

There were never three Popes. There were three claimants but there could never be three Popes at once.

 

BTW If you ever go to Rome you must see Michaelangelo's Pieta, just inside St. Peter's on the right. It's stunning. I liked to stand stand and gaze at it when I was there.

Share this post


Link to post

Hi Bebe, I saw the Pieta when I was there, and it is magnificent as you have said. I just wish I could have gotten a little closer to it (but I understand why that's no longer possible). I only had about 1/2 of a day to see the Vatican, and that, as I'm sure you are well aware, is hardly enough time. It is a truly amazing place :)

 

--David

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • A Schism coming in the Church?

      It looks as though the divide between the traditional conservatives and the modernisers may be something the church might not pull itself together over. One of the traditionalist parishes appointed their minister a bishop, approved by a traditional South African church. The CofE are not happy, but with him falling under the remit of the Archbishop of York, who has not commented, there's little the church can do. The question is that the CofE contains hundreds or thousands of buildings, parishes, and places of worship. Will it retain them, or would the new church have the right to retain them as it is serving the parishoners and they no longer want to be part of the CofE? Then there are the political complications, with the head of the CofE being the Queen, would she remain head of the breakaway church or would they found a new one?

      in General Faith

    • WATCH: Are Catholics Heard Shouting ‘Vigano! Vigano!’ During Papal Address?

      During a recent Papal address in St. Peter's Square, video appears to show a crowd of Catholics openly chanting "Vigano! Vigano!" — the name of an Archbishop who published a shocking letter over the weekend alleging that Pope Francis had a hand in covering up sexual abuse accusations made against former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick. The mics quickly go dead, but not before the chant concludes. WATCH: View the full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Evangelical Ethiopian Helps End Orthodox Schism

      Africa’s youngest head of state heals the wounds of one of its oldest churches. Ending 27 years of schism, Ethiopian Orthodox Christians in their homeland and in America reunited the two feuding branches of one of the world’s oldest churches. Ironically, the push came from the Horn of Africa nation’s new evangelical prime minister. “It is impossible to think of Ethiopia without taking note of the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, which is both great and sacred,” said Abiy Ahmed at the July 27 ceremony in Washington, reported the Fana state-run news agency. A member of the World Council of Churches, the Tewahedo church split in 1991 due to political manipulations. After the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) removed the Derg military junta from power, Patriarch Abune Merkorios was forced to abdicate. He later fled to the United States, where dissidents and diaspora Ethiopians formed a rival patriarchate. According to church tradition, the position is held for life, they maintained. Following the reconciliation, Patriarch Merkorios will return to Ethiopia’s capital, Addis Ababa, to serve alongside the incumbent Patriarch Mathias, who will maintain administrative authority. Their honor will be equal, and the names of both will be lifted in prayer as long as both are alive, reported OCP News Service, an Orthodox media network. All mutual excommunications will be lifted, and bishops appointed by the rival synods will continue in service. Significantly, delegates unanimously requested forgiveness from the “heartbroken” children of the church. “Division has no benefit,” Aba Efrem, head of Saint Marcos Church, told the Ethiopian Herald, a government-owned newspaper. “Unity can do more for the church to strengthen peace and love ... Continue reading... View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

    • The schism in Europe

      The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate is the only canonical church in Ukraine recognized by the Ecumenical Patriarchate. 39 percent, that is, the majority of Ukrainian Orthodox is parishioners of the Moscow Patriarchate. There is another denomination - the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate (UOC-KP), which did not get the status of canonical. The UOC-KP is considered an alternative Orthodox (in religious terminology this is called "the schism", split of the church).   How do the churches of the Moscow and Kiev Patriarchate differ in practice and why the first one is recognized as canonical? A person who goes to Ukrainian churches once or twice a year to put a candle on, will not find differences, but they are significant. The Moscow Patriarchate, for example, does not accept a free interpretation of prayer, inventing new icons or frescoes. For the clergy and parishioners of the UOC-MP it is inadmissible to pray for the peace of the conditional enemy-more precisely, they do not define enemies in principle, which can not be said about the UOC-KP. Also, the Moscow Patriarchate holds divine services in the Church Slavonic language, and the Kyiv Patriarchate in Ukrainian, translating the Holy Scripture in its own way.   But the key difference is that the founder of the UOC-MP is Jesus Christ. The Church is in unity with the Universal Orthodoxy, with common ordinances, whereas the Kyiv Patriarchate recognizes only those ordinances that are pleasing to him. It was in order to undermine the unwanted faith, Ukrainian politicians developed a bill that oppresses the UOC-MP. Moscow Patriarchate decided to oblige to obtain from the state consent to the appointment of priests and abbots right up to the regional level.   In such a situation, the threat of destroying the parishes of the country's main confession is an excuse for distraction. Political technology is clear: national radicals, hiding behind icons, will demand the closure of "pro-Moscow" temples throughout the country. Ukrainian citizens will stand up for their parishes, priests, spiritual guides. Examples, when the temples of the UOC-MP captured the banned in Russia nationalist groups, is already enough. In different regions of Ukraine radicals attack cult buildings, beat parishioners and forcibly transfer temples to the Kyiv Patriarchate.  

      in Off Topic Discussion

    • The Petra we stand on. Was it a grammatical issue that caused the schism of 1054?

      Recently, i was just browsing through a post of /christian/, and as it typically goes, the post becomes a sh**fest about papal supremacy, but there was an Orthobrox that gave a link full of biblical arguments against the R.Catholic church's authority. One of the link's case demonstrates that for Matthew 16:18 there a definitional distinctions between in Greek for Peter; Petros meaning a small individual stone-masculine(like the ones R.catholics enjoy throwing at our windows), and the 'Rock'; Petra which means rock of a large mass-feminine(it also can refer to a cliff or a boulder).   This contrast conceptually makes perfect sense for other verses such as 1 Corinthians 10:4, 1 Peter 2:4-8, etc. as they utilize the term Petra to illustrate the notion that people are the stones(Petros) for the temple of God with Christ as our foundation(Petra). But I researched farther, the Latin Vulgate 'conveniently' omits these characteristics like that of the Greek, with the latin word for 'Rock'(petram) as a very generic description for a stone, and 'Peter' is just a name(Petrus). Although St.Jerome, St.Augustine, and others, seemly understood the Greek translation.   f I properly did my research, then here my question: Do you think this division of language between the East, who spoke primarily Greek, and the West, who increasing only spoke Latin, helped to motivate the papal divergence within the schism of 1054? P.S. Please forgive me if I made any grammatical mistakes. English isn't my strongest subject.      

      in Apologetics and Theology

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.