Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
William

Was Ham Cursed?

Recommended Posts

Staff

by Ken Ham on January 26, 2013

 

Recently, some atheists have accused me and the Creation Museum of teaching the so-called “curse of Ham”—which we don’t and isn’t even in the Bible!

 

Now, I often jokingly say that I’m pretty sensitive about this issue, since my last name is “Ham.” Seriously, I think it’s important that people understand that we don’t teach the “curse of Ham”—or that dark-skinned peoples are “cursed.”

 

“Then he said: ‘Cursed be Canaan; A servant of servants He shall be to his brethren.’” (Genesis 9:25)

 

Some of these atheists then use the statement (made to Canaan) about “servants” to claim we teach that dark-skinned people would be slaves. All this is so, so wrong.

 

Ham had four sons. Canaan was the youngest of the four. While Scripture is unclear about why exactly Noah cursed Canaan for Ham’s sin, what we can be clear about is that Noah’s curse had nothing to do with skin tone. Noah’s curse had to do with a rebellious son, not skin color. One only has to look at Canaan’s descendants to see some of the most-wicked rebellious people who ever lived and who were judged for their godlessness and immorality. (For more information on the possible reasons for the curse on Canaan, see Troy Lacey’s article “The Curse of Canaan.”)

 

 

shackles.jpg

 

Part of the anti-racism exhibit in the Creation Museum that repudiates the so-called “curse of Ham.”

 

What is frustrating as I read these totally false charges against the museum is that we have an anti-racism exhibit inside the museum, and it very specifically teaches against a supposed “curse of Ham.” In a museum display, we declare that it is wrong to argue “that dark skin color was a curse upon Noah’s son Ham.” Yet opponents of the museum say it teaches a “curse of Ham.” Incredible.

 

Of course, many atheist bloggers simply don’t do proper research (even though some of them possess PhDs, and so you’d think they would do their research) or simply want to propagate lies about the Creation Museum even though they know better. For example, one atheist blogger (I won’t give the link to his blog because his language is so vile and crude) claims that I’m entirely “ignorant of actual history,” and yet he shows great ignorance of biblical history as it relates to Noah and Ham:

You see Ham was punished to be a servant to his brothers because . . . Ham was the one who tried to cover [Noah] up and give him some “decency”. So he was cursed to be an effective Slave. The descendants of Ham go to Africa. The entire notion that Africa is nothing but savages is born out of this culture (Bear in mind during the 2nd millenia BC was the rise of the Nubian Pharaohs of Egypt when Egypt picked a fight with Nubia and lost) and the western practice of ignoring African history was entrenched in this notion that nothing good can come from the “Descendants of Ham”. When black people were kept as slaves the argument put forward from Christians was precisely what Ken is flogging. That the descendants of Ham are divinely ordained to be slaves.

Another atheist blogger wrote that we push “racist propaganda”—like the “curse of Ham”—at the Creation Museum:

Despite all of this, which can be written off as pure stupidity and fodder for jokes, on a more serious side the museum pushes racist propaganda, by promoting the Curse of Ham. Basically, the story is based on the mythical Noah placing a curse on Noah’s mythical grandson, Canaan, for some biblical insanity of some sort. . . . So, biblical scholars (how hard is it to study the Bronze Age Goatherder’s Book of Fairytales, Myths, and Hallucinations) have stated that Canaan was made black, and exiled to Africa. Why is this racist? Well, it was used for many years to justify slavery, and, more recently, why blacks are somehow inferior to white people. (
)

A few years ago, Secular News Daily’s editor, Mike Daniels, posted an article titled “Creation Museum Says Black People Are Cursed by Noah,” also claiming that the Creation Museum teaches racism:

So . . . Noah cursed Ham’s son, Canaan, to be “a servant of servants”. According to the Creation Museum, Canaan and his descendants populated Africa. They were called [the nation of] Canaan, or Canaanites. Populated Africa . . . That’d make them black folks, huh? The argument that Noah cursed all of Canaan’s descendants has been used for centuries to justify the enslavement of black people. And Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum continues to promote this belief (
).

Well, unfortunately for these and other terribly wrong bloggers, the idea that racism originated with the Bible is unfounded.

 

Some bloggers claim we blame racism on evolution—which is simply not true. It originated with sin. On the contrary, it was evolutionary ideas that really fueled many racist attitudes over the past 150 years. For example, one famous evolutionist, Ernst Haeckel, once wrote, “At the lowest stage of human mental development are the Australians, some tribes of the Polynesians, and the Bushmen, Hottentots, and some of the Negro tribes" (from The History of Creation, pp. 362–363). Incredible. Haeckel placed dark-skinned peoples “at the lowest stage of human mental development”! One thing is clear—he didn’t get that belief from the Bible!

 

In fact, Charles Darwin himself had some very racist views, which he expressed in The Descent of Man:

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes. . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian [aborigine] and the gorilla. (p. 336)

You see, Darwin even believed that dark-skinned peoples were closer to gorillas than humans. That’s not certainly what the Bible teaches!

Even a decorated scientist and evolutionist James Watson, who co-discovered DNA, commented that the intelligence of dark-skinned Africans is supposedly sub par, which caused a media frenzy about his racist evolutionary views. (Read the full article here: www.independent.co.uk.)

 

The creation account in Genesis tells us that man was made in God’s image. All of mankind ultimately descended from the original pair, Adam and Eve. The first couple would have had all the genetic material in them to have all the various skin tones and variations we see today. And when God judged the sinful world of Noah’s day with the global Flood, it was Noah’s family that repopulated the earth, who shared that genetic material. In other words, we are all one race, the human race, with variations and mixings that have occurred many times over.

 

Some of these atheist bloggers claim we are racist because we discuss that certain people in Africa are descended from Noah’s son Ham. But they fail to explain that we teach that many different people groups descended from Ham, including the Chinese.

 

Below is a summary of the people groups that we teach descended from each of Noah’s sons—though keep in mind there has been considerable mixing (for the full chart, visit www.answersingenesis.org/assets/pdf/2013/chart-of-people-groups.pdf):

 

Japheth: Germanic tribes (e.g., Angles and Saxons), French, Welsh, Spain, Greece, Portugal, Poland, Turkey, Russia (four major ones: Meshech, Magog, Tubal and Togarmah), Ukraine, Mongolia, Medes, Northern India, some in Southwestern China (Maio peoples), some American tribes

 

Shem: Jews, Arabs, Assyrians, many North Africans, Much of India, Indonesia, Armenia, Turkey, some to the Orient, Iran

 

Ham: Chinese, Egypt, Libya, West Africa (Phut), Middle East (Canaan), Sinai, Hindu Kush in Asia and Mizoram in Asia, many island nations of Asia, Ethiopia and lower Africa, Babylonia, some of the American tribes (e.g., Athabascans), Portugal, and Spain (due to the Moors mixing)

 

I’m now to the stage of assuming that the reason the secularists continue to lie about what AiG and the Creation Museum teach is because it is a deliberate attempt to malign us. And why? Because they can’t use scientific facts to discredit us, so they misquote, misrepresent, and construct untruths so they can falsely accuse us—and name call—in their attempts to undermine our integrity.

 

Let’s stop talking about the supposed curse of Ham. There was NO curse of Ham! This false idea, together with the false belief that a supposed (non-existent) curse is connected to people with dark skin, have sadly been used by some people as a basis for racism and prejudice. But we need to stand against such anti-biblical, false ideas that are used to cause harm!

 

Yes, I have to admit that I am quite frustrated by these false claims. You see, we have a large section of our museum that is devoted to combating racism (and it offers a biblical solution), and yet some of our museum opponents—without a shred of evidence but with an intent to harm—say our displays promote racism! Incredible. It would be like claiming that certain exhibits in civil rights museums in the South promote racism towards dark-skinned people! Of course they don’t, and our museum doesn’t either.

 

In today’s News to Note column on our home page, Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell looks more at the false charge that biblical creationists teach the so-called (and non-existent) “curse of Ham.”

 

Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,

Ken

 

https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/k...as-ham-cursed/

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

I don't really understand how he can say he doesn't teach the curse of Ham when he has a picture showing a small blip about it. The problem is just putting a footnote on something as complex as slavery. Everyone is so sensitive that it's probably how it was handled. How Christianity was abused to justify slavery was way more complex than just the curse of Ham, it was more insidious. So I kind of understand how people can ridicule the little footnote, even though I don't agree. There is nothing technically wrong about what is posted but it lacks depth.

Share this post


Link to post

One thing people don't get is a curse, being a servant can be turned into a blessing by God. There was Levite's curse for example.

I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel
Scattered they were but they got to be God's servants. The curse of Ham (serving his brothers) actually gets to be a blessing when Jesus came
the Gentiles lord it over them, and their superiors exercise authority over them. It shall not be this way among you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first among you must be your slave
To be great you must serve. The curse made Hamites servants but that's what we should be. Servants of God and also servants of each other.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Another part of the fallacy of this presumption is that everyone who lived in that region (and still lives) were dark skinned, including the Israelites. This was further highlighted when someone pointed out that Jesus was not a white guy. He had the same skin tone as anyone else living in that region.

 

Really, this curse argument is just another ploy atheists have to undermine God. And we all know how that will end.

Share this post


Link to post

Well I think that on the whole @LeapOfFaith89 is right in saying that when you put a little footnote about a sensitive issue like we have here, you are bound to get people who will want to argue or misinterpret it. That is just par for course as far as I am concerned. What I do like is that if anyone ever continues to make this claim, I have a great place to go and just say "here, read this". Well done, and thank you putting it so eloquently. I did not know that your last name was Ham either, so that is good to know.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Cursed Ground of Genesis

      Gen 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you [Adam & Eve] every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.   Adam and Eve were fed from the fruit of the trees God gave them. They never had to go grocery shopping.   Gen 2:8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.   God did all the hard work of planting a garden. God then put Adam and Eve into a ready made garden. It was a garden unlike anything that exists today. That one garden had all they would ever need for an eternity of pleasure. The word “Eden” comes from the root of the Hebrew word for means “pleasure.” We can't begin to imagine the fullness of such a way of life.   Gen 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food;   God did all the heavy lifting to provide them with food. God made the trees to grow. Adam and Eve simply enjoyed the fruits of God’s labour.   Gen 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.   All in all, they had a pretty easy job. Remember, God made the food to grow. They never had to worry about “losing the crop.” They just kept things trimmed up a bit.   Suddenly things took a turn for the worse. Adam and Eve disobeyed God. They did not believe him when he told them they would die if they ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.   Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.   God not only told them they would die, but that they surely would die.   But, instead of believing God they believed the lies of the serpent, the devil, who told Eve they would not die if they ate from that tree. In fact, he told them they would be just like God.   Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:   Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.   It’s the same today. People either believe God or the lies of the devil. The true greatness of any nation does not depend on politics, but whether or not the people of that nation know and believe the truth in God’s Word. Unfortunately, most look to a man, a Reagan, a Bush, A Clinton, an Obama, or a Trump. Few look to God. That explains the present sad state of America and every other nation in the world today.   Gen 3:17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;   Gen 3:18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;   That’s just what the ground does. It’s not God’s fault. He never meant for man to live in such an environment. Remember, He had put them in a most decidedly different environment, namely the garden of Eden. God knew a lot more about things than Adam and Eve knew. He knew what would happen if they ate from the tree and he was nice enough to tell them all about it. After all, he was their father, so why wouldn’t he have warned them.   By looking up every verse in the Bible where the word “curse” is used it becomes apparent that a curse was not some spell God cast on the ground out of spite or vengeance. Instead the word is used in a predictive sense. God was just telling them what would happen.   Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.   God certainly didn’t trick Adam and Eve. He was completely upfront with them. When they disobeyed God, they turned their backs on God, not the other way around. God has not punished them any more than you could be said to have punished your child because he or she didn’t believe you about the heat of fire and stuck his hand into it.   Gen 3:19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.   Now they had to work a lot harder. A whole lot harder. Sweat and all. Clearing, plowing, planting, harvesting, processing, storing, etc. All backbreaking work. But that’s not all. No matter how hard they worked, there would never be a guaranteed harvest. Floods, droughts, insects, and more could destroy the entire crop at any time. The very fact that there are people starving in this world says it all. In the garden of Eden nobody would have starved.   All thing considered, compared to what they had in Eden, I would say that “cursed” is a most appropriate adjective to describe the new ground in which they found themselves!   As far as the word itself goes, a curse is the opposite of a blessing. Israel was about to enter the promised land when God gave them some final instructions.   Deut:11:26 Behold, I set before you this day a blessing and a curse;   Deut:11:27 A blessing, if ye obey the commandments of the LORD your God, which I command you this day:   Deut:11:28 And a curse, if ye will not obey the commandments of the LORD your God, but turn aside out of the way which I command you this day, to go after other gods, which ye have not known.   Before Adam and Eve sinned none of this would have been an issue. There were no curses in Eden, only blessings. That was God's desire. That's what he wanted for them. Adam and Eve just made the wrong choice when they believed the serpent instead of God. The cursed ground wasn't really anything God did to them.   The good news: God will set everything back to "normal" in the end. Revelations, usually considered doom and gloom is arguably the best thing that God will ever do.   Rev 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.   The people on that new earth will once again live in a garden of Eden. But there is a big difference between the new garden and the old one. The difference is that Adam and Eve had a major stipulation if they wanted to remain in that garden. Their stay in paradise was conditional, namely, they could be kicked out if the ate of the tree of knowledge and evil. No such stipulation will exist in the new heavens and new earth. It will be an eternal kingdom and there will be nothing any man or woman can do to change that. Guaranteed eternal bliss. That is the hope of all born again believers.   Col 1:27 To whom [born again believers] God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:   That's certainly something to look forward to!  

      in Bible Study

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.