Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
News Feeder

Disposal of Greenpeace Vessels Causes Environmental Scandal

Recommended Posts

By American Media Institute -

220px-Rainbow_Warrior-1.svg_.png

By Tim Nerrozi

The environmental group Greenpeace is facing an ecological and public relations disaster after it allowed its iconic flagship vessel to be stripped in a Bangladeshi shipping yard.

For years, many government agencies and NGOs have argued that lax standards make the Indian subcontinent unsuitable for processing old ships. Nevertheless, Greenpeace left its famous vessel, Rongdhonu (a.k.a.) Rainbow Warrior II, for scrap in Bangladesh when it determined it could no longer use the ship, which was built in 1957.

The disposal of the Rainbow Warrior II is expected to have risked the spread of numerous toxic materials into local beach ecosystems.

The organization, which was founded to protect against environmental crimes, is now answering for unintentionally committing one of their own.

“We have made a mistake, one that we have tried to correct. We have allowed the Rongdhonu, formerly the Rainbow Warrior (II), to be scrapped on a beaching yard in Bangladesh, in a way that does not live up to the standards we set ourselves and campaigned with our allies to have adopted across the world,” said Greenpeace in a public statement on their website addressing the issue.

The company that bought the vessel, GMS, says Greenpeace is giving in to political correctness. Noting that the Bangladeshi shipyard have received a Statement of Compliance with the Hong Kong Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, Dr. Nikos Mikelis, Non-Executive Director of GMS, said. “They had located the best yard in Bangladesh where their aged Bangladeshi flagship Rongdhonu was operating. I cannot see that they had any other option that could be justified in economic terms or in terms of environmental impact. It is very unfortunate that political expediency has now Greenpeace backtracking and apologizing to their associates.”

He added: “I find it very hard to understand how is it possible for an organization such as Greenpeace, that relies on charity and therefore needs to be governed by an ethical core of principles, to ignore the damage it can inflict by aligning itself to an irrational anti-beaching policy and rhetoric.

This isn’t the first time the ship has been involved in an environmental controversy. The vessel was involved in an international incident in 2005 when it crashed into and damaged the Tubbataha Reef, a protected environmental area and World Heritage site in the Philippines.

Greenpeace ceased use of the vessel in 2011 after it was deemed unusable for international travel. The boat was sold to Bangladeshi non-profit Friendship for use as a hospital boat. It was Friendship, with the expressed approval of Greenpeace, which sent the vessel to its environmentally-damaging demise.

“When we transferred the ship to Friendship in 2011 we retained the right of veto over any final disposal plan,” said Greenpeace in their assessment. “She became a Bangladeshi ship, owned, operated and flagged and only licensed to sail inland and coastal waters. Given its condition, we presumed it would need to be decommissioned in the best way possible in Bangladesh.”

First launched for Greenpeace in 1989, the vessel quickly became the bane of shore oil operations and whaling operations as it was used to intimidate and sabotage such commercial activity.  Greenpeace utilized the ship and its predecessor to protest such activities.

The vessel became Greenpeace’s iconic ship after its predecessor, the  Rainbow Warrior I, was destroyed in 1985 by the French special forces off the coast of New Zealand under orders from the French government. The boat was bombed on its way to protest French nuclear testing, and Dutch photographer Fernando Pereira was killed. The attack created an international scandal.

In the past, Greenpeace has actively demonstrated against not only nuclear testing, but also off-shore oil drilling and controversial whaling practices in East Asia.

Greenpeace has faced other controversies. It was forced to fire an employee in 2014 after national and regional offices lost a total of more than $5.15 million dollars in donations by betting on fluctuating currency markets. Currency investment is not unusual for international organizations as a means of increasing financial resources, but the organization’s investment in the euro proved miscalculated.

In the same year, Greenpeace was prosecuted by the Peruvian government for vandalizing Machu Picchu as well as sacred Nazca lines with anti-fossil fuel messages.

And now it finds itself in another controversy, pitting environmental groups against poor nations.

“I find it very hard to understand how is it possible for an organization such as Greenpeace, that relies on charity and therefore needs to be governed by an ethical core of principles, to ignore the damage it can inflict by aligning itself to an irrational anti-beaching policy and rhetoric, Mikelis said. “Isn’t that what it is all about? Improved working conditions, improved workers’ safety, improved environmental protection. The alternative that is promoted by Greenpeace’s associates seeks an impossible future whereby Rongdhonu and all the end-of-life ships would be recycled in Europe, where no economic justification exists for the recycling of ocean-going ships.”.

The controversies have not deterred  Greenpeace. Currently, it is focusing attention on their protests against Japanese whaling practices. Last month, the government of Japan announced their withdrawal from the International Whaling Commission. Sam Annesley, Executive Director of Greenpeace Japan, called the move “out of step with the international community” in an official press release.

Source: American Media Institute

Disposal of Greenpeace Vessels Causes Environmental Scandal is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more.

View the original full article

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Scandal After High School Video Of Mike Pence Dancing Surfaces

      U.S.—A teary-eyed Mike Pence apologized to the nation Monday after a high school video of the VP dancing enthusiastically surfaced and made the rounds on social media. The post Scandal After High School Video Of Mike Pence Dancing Surfaces appeared first on The Babylon Bee. View the original full article

      in Christian Satire

    • ‘Kill Me a Son’: The Beautiful Scandal of Abraham’s Sacrifice

      As Abraham lifts the knife above Isaac, many Christians reach for the scissors, at least mentally. We want to pull a Thomas Jefferson and snip out the story from our Bibles. In Genesis 22, God commands Abraham to sacrifice his beloved son. Many conclude that this, surely, is an embarrassment to modern sensibilities, an affront to our common humanity. It’s an unbridgeable barrier to faith for any right-minded enquirer, isn’t it? Bob Dylan retells the story like this: Oh God said to Abraham, “Kill me a son”
      Abe says, “Man, you must be puttin’ me on”
      God say, “No.” Abe say, “What?” (“Highway 61 Revisited“) “What?” isn’t Abraham’s response in the Bible, but Dylan is putting words to our alarm: You must be puttin’ me on! Child sacrifice? In a holy book? What should we make of such a story? I love Genesis 22. It is perhaps my favorite chapter in all the Bible. I don’t want to get out the scissors; I want to get out the magnifying glass. Because if we train our eyes to see what’s there, this chapter becomes not a barrier to faith but an almighty boost. But we need to begin with some basics. What Is the Bible? Sometimes Christians are the worst at answering that question. Some will reply, “The Maker’s Instruction Manual,” or “God’s Road Map.” Creative types have even given us an acronym: BIBLE stands for “Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth.” Most often people, whether Christian or not, see it essentially as a moral guidebook. But if we read Genesis 22 through that lens, we’re in for a shock. When God says, “Sacrifice your son,” how should we react? Go and do likewise? No. If we copied or endorsed each practice in the Bible, we’d be in a terrible mess (not to mention jail). Genesis 22 should be read the way the whole Bible should be read. First and foremost it’s a biography—the Spirit’s testimony to the Son. And when we see it this way, the entirety of Scripture comes into focus. Testimony to Jesus The key to the passage is to ask this question: Who is Isaac? Answer: Abraham’s offspring. He’s the immediate fulfillment of the cosmic promises God has been making since Genesis 12. The offspring of Abraham will save and bless the world (Gen. 12:2–3, 7; 15:5; 17:4–8). In the meantime, the “offspring” of Abraham will be the nation of Israel. In the long run, the “offspring” is Christ (Gal. 3:16). But in the first instance—before the Abrahamic people and before their Messiah—we get Isaac. Picture baby Isaac lying in Abraham’s arms. What do you have? You have the hope of the world. No Isaac, no Israel. No Israel, no Christ. No Christ, no salvation. So whatever you do, Abraham, don’t drop him! And then we read Genesis 22: “Take your son, your only son, whom you love—Isaac—and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.” Everyone is shocked by this verse, but to the attentive reader it’s actually more shocking, not less, because we know who Isaac is. He’s the offspring of Abraham, the hope of the world! Through Isaac will come all God’s blessings to the nations. And now God wants him slain as a burnt offering (i.e., a sacrifice of atonement, Lev. 1:4). Apparently this is the way God will save the world—through the beloved son offered up on a mountain. Notice that this mountain is in “the region of Moriah.” Mount Moriah will become temple mount in Jerusalem (2 Chron. 3:1). At some point the penny may just drop. Getting It I was once teaching this story to teenagers, sketching the picture layer by layer: “Isaac is the only beloved son, the hope of the world, the source of all blessing. He’s trudging up the hill with wood on his back (Gen. 22:6); remind you of anything? It’s a hill near Jerusalem; ring any bells?” Suddenly, it was as if someone electrocuted a girl in the front row. In a good way. She started thumping her friend next to her—really thumping her—with the kind of violence born of pure joy: “Oh my gosh, oh my gosh, oh my gosh. It’s Jesus! It’s Jesus! It’s totally Jesus!” That, essentially, is why the Bible was written. It was written to make us say, “It’s Jesus, it’s Jesus, it’s totally Jesus!” When we read the Scriptures like this, they start to make sense. Instead of Genesis 22 being an insurmountable barrier to faith, with Jesus at the center it becomes an incredible boost to faith. Remember that Genesis 22 records an event two millennia before Christ was crucified. But from the beginning, the Bible has always been testifying to history’s central event. He Will Provide Abraham’s faith shines through the chapter. He reassures Isaac, “God himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering” (v. 8). Somehow a substitute will be provided. Somehow God will offer a lamb and everything will be okay. Abraham knows that Isaac is the promised one, the hope of the world. So whatever happens, Isaac will make it through—Abraham has this resurrection-shaped faith (Heb. 11:17–19). On this occasion a ram is provided. Which means the “lamb” is yet future. So the whole episode concludes: “Abraham called that place The Lord Will Provide. And to this day it is said, On the mountain of the Lord it will be provided” (Gen. 22:14). Notice the future tense. God will provide. What will he provide? The Lamb of God, the Offspring of Abraham, the Beloved Son, the Hope of the World. One day, on that very mountain, God would provide the ultimate atonement. And many knew it. For centuries afterward they would point to that hill and say: “The true sacrifice is coming, and that’s where he’ll be provided.” What’s It All About? God didn’t ask Abraham to go through with the sacrifice. But one dark Friday, God would provide. The beloved Son of the Father would walk willingly up that hill, carrying the wood on his back. And there he would be slain to save and bless the world. If we attempt to read the Bible primarily as a rulebook, it crumbles between our fingers. With such a mindset, Genesis 22 is a scandal and a barrier to faith. Yet when Scripture is read as intended, we see it as a testimony to Christ. Suddenly we realize that all the Bible, and all believers in every age, are fixed on the one truth that towers above all others: “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). Related: 20 Quotes from Glen Scrivener on the Whole Bible Story (Matt Smethurst) View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

    • GROWING SCANDAL: Undercover FBI Agent Paid Thousands Supporting Gillum Fundraiser, Report Says

      The corruption scandal surrounding Florida Democratic gubernatorial nominee Andrew Gillum continued to grow on Friday as newly-released documents show that an undercover FBI agent, who posed as a developer seeking to do business with Gillum's Tallahassee government, allegedly paid thousands of dollars to support a fundraiser for Gillum's political action committee, Forward Florida. View the full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Vessels Prepared for Destruction

      Excerpt from Dr. James White's book "The Potter's Freedom" (pages 211-214):
      The example of Pharoah was well known to any person familiar with the Old Testament. God destroyed the Egyptian nation by plagues so as to demonstrate His might and power in the earth, and key to this demonstration was the hardening of Pharoah's heart. Before Moses had met with Pharoah the first time God told him:
      It was God's intention to bring His wrath upon the Egyptians. God's actions were not "forced" by the stubborn will of the Egyptian leader. God said He would harden Pharoah's heart, and He did. Listen to the impudent response of this pagan idolater to the command of Moses: View the full article

      in Soteriology and Reformation Theology

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.