Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
News Feeder

Boy Discovers Wondrous Land Of Narnia, Leaves Negative Yelp Review

Recommended Posts


TOLEDO, OH—When local pastor's kid Cooper Braxton went rummaging around in the church's storage room looking for some crackers to munch on, he was delighted to find the custodial closet actually led to the magical land of Narnia, sources confirmed Tuesday.

The post Boy Discovers Wondrous Land Of Narnia, Leaves Negative Yelp Review appeared first on The Babylon Bee.

View the original full article

Share this post

Link to post

How can anyone have a negative opinion of Narnia?  I can think of only one possible explanation.  The boy must have met the White Witch and eaten some of her Turkish delight.

Share this post

Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Old Dominion University Star Quarterback Leaves Football to Pursue Ministry

      Old Dominion University star Quarterback Blake LaRussa broke the news on Wednesday that he would be graduating from the four-year university early to pursue a life in ministry. View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

    • How Jesus Became God (Bart D. Ehrman): A Short Review

      Since one of my favorite topics is the worship of Christ I was interested to see what Bart Ehrman had to say about it in his book How Jesus Became God.    1. Under Widespread Jewish Beliefs he asserts the following:  At the heart of the Jewish law was the commandment to worship the God of Israel alone. (page 51)  My response: The fact that the Lord Jesus is the proper recipient of worship demonstrates that the first Christians believed He was/is God. https://www.christforums.org/topic/6234-yes-it-is-proper-to-worship-the-lord-jesus-christ/?tab=comments#comment-35084    2. In order to escape this fact it reads on page 127 that, "...kings were worshiped-even in the Bible (Matt. 18:26)-by veneration and obeisance, just as God was. Here, Jesus may be accepting the worship due to him as the future king." My response: Kings were never (properly) worshiped, only God was (properly) worshiped. Indeed, worship is properly due unto "the God of Israel alone" (page 51).   3. On page 248 it reads: But it is interesting, even in the class context, to see that my students' Christological views tend to be drawn more from the Gospel of John than from the other three, earlier Gospels. It is in the Gospel of John, and only in John, that Jesus says such things as "before Abraham was, I am" (8:58) and "I and the Father are one" (10:30). In this Gospel Jesus says, "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father" (14:9). And in this Gospel Jesus talks about existing in a glorified state with God the Father before he became human (17:5). That's what many of my students believe. But as they study the New Testament more, they come to see that such self-claims are not made by Jesus in Matthew, Mark, or Luke. So who is right?  My response: All 4 are correct. The oneness Jesus spoke of in John 14:9 is also taught in Matthew 28:19 where both He and the Father, as well as the Holy Spirit, share in the one Name whereby a person is baptized into. See this passage (Matthew 28:19) and the citations with it in the link I supplied in #1 above. Not only that, this oneness of power (omnipotence) and knowledge (omniscience) is also shared by Christ with the Father (Matthew 11:27; Luke 10:22; cf. see footnote #1 in "Matthew 11:27-30" in the link from #1 above). Finally, in Mark 14:62 the Lord Jesus is the Son of Man spoken of in Daniel 7 where He properly receives universal worship due unto God alone (Daniel 7:14; cf. see "Daniel 7:13-14" in the link I provided from #1 above).     Other quotes 4. On page 86 it reads: I realized that some of the authors of the New Testament do not equate Jesus with God.  My response: All of them (no exceptions) equate Jesus with God. They are Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, James, Peter and Jude.   5. On page 269 he affirms that Jesus is called "God" in Romans 9:5 in that Christ was "an angelic, divine being before coming into the world; he was the Angel of the Lord; he was eventually exalted to be equal with God and worthy of all of God's honor and worship." My response: I agree that Jesus is referred to as "God" in Romans 9:5, and He was the Angel of the Lord in the Old Testament. But this doesn't mean He was created. See Genesis 48:15-16 in the link I provided from #1 above. The Book of Hebrews presents Christ as "superior to the angels" (page 281) - that is the created angels, because He, as God (1:8), is uncreated and therefore worthy of worship (1:6).

      in God (Trinitarian doctrines)

    • Worship and the Risen Jesus in the Pauline Letters by Tony Costa (A short review)

      I think this was a very good book. It had a lot of interesting and detailed information concerning the worship properly rendered unto the Lord Jesus.    Below are some citations (pretty much one from each chapter) which I felt were important for me to highlight. There were quite a few very good ones but I'd like to limit myself to about 1 per chapter.   Chapter 1  "While the place of the risen Jesus in Christian worship plays a role in the worship of God for Paul, there are times where the risen Jesus is also included in a worship context where he becomes the object of worship." (page 7)   Chapter 2  Concerning Jerome Neyrey: While Neyrey states that the meaning of words is found in "the cultural use of them" and "not in lexica," one wonders how one should understand the cultural use of such words without the aid of lexica to define them. (page 291, footnote #160)   Chapter 3  "A prerequisite to calling on the Lord involves having a pure heart. This can imply that anyone can call on the Lord, but that the proper mode or state of calling on the Lord must involve a pure heart. The worshipper must be authentic in his worship." (page 61)  I think it wold have been nice to see Psalm 145:18 cited.   Chapter 4   "In short, idolatry can be defined as the worship of anything or anyone other than God." (page 129)  "It misrepresents God by depicting him as a finite entity (thus blurring the distinctions between creator and creature), and it dishonors him by rendering the honor that belongs to God to a created material object." (page 130)   Chapter 5  Concerning 1 Thessalonians 3:11-13:  "If 1 Thessalonians is our earliest Pauline letter (and therefore the earliest Christian written document), then we can state that from the earliest written Christian record, prayer in the Pauline faith communities was addressed particularly to two divine persons: God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ." (page 200)   Chapter 6  "The worship given to the exalted Jesus does not threaten or challenge the worship of God; it is not an act of "Jesus-olatry", rather it complements the worship of God." (page 246)  Concerning Jesus-olatry in footnote #126 on page 432 it reads: "The term is used by Dunn, Did the First Christian Worship Jesus? 147 who uses it in a negative way in his discussion on monotheism. Dunn assumes that the outright worship of Jesus challenges monotheism or the worship of God, which is the exact opposite of what Paul is trying to say: the worship of Jesus leads to and is consistent with the worship of God."   Chapter 7 The Conclusion  "I thus conclude from this that my hypothesis regarding the place and relation of the risen Jesus to Christian worship as an object of worship has been justified by my findings." (page 275)     Final Comments  I think several more passages could have been cited and explored which Paul taught the worship of Christ. It has been several months since I read this book so I can't remember all of them but 1 Corinthians 6:17 comes to mind.  What I found to be excellent was on pages 195-196 some (yes, they are Trinitarians) have attempted to dilute the worship rendered unto the Lord Jesus and Costa calls them out on it. They do this by saying Christ is rendered either homage or prayer but that it isn't official worship or that it is a relative form of worship. I really enjoyed this section of the book.

      in God (Trinitarian doctrines)

    • Michael Flynn Judge Seeks Review Of Key FBI Notes Before Sentencing Decision |

      By Chuck Ross - The judge presiding over the Michael Flynn case is ordering a review of key FBI documents before deciding on a sentence for the former national security adviser. Judge Emmet Sullivan wants to review a memo put together on Jan. 24, 2017 by former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. He also wants to look at FBI notes from that interview. Flynn’s lawyers revealed Tuesday that McCabe wrote he urged Flynn to meet with FBI agents without an attorney because it would be the “quickest” way to complete the meeting.  The federal judge who will issue a sentence against Michael Flynn next week wants to review FBI documents related to a fateful White House interview that the retired lieutenant general gave to two FBI agents just days into his tenure as President Donald Trump’s national security adviser. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on Wednesday ordered Flynn’s lawyers to hand over two documents: a memo that then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe wrote after speaking with Flynn ahead his Jan. 24, 2017 interview with two FBI agents and the FBI summary of notes taken during that same interview. That summary, known as an FD-302, was compiled on Aug. 22, 2017 by the two FBI agents who interviewed Flynn. It is unclear why the summary was put together seven months after the Flynn interview. Flynn pleaded guilty on Dec. 1, 2017 to lying to the FBI agents regarding his conversations during the presidential transition period with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Sullivan also ordered the special counsel to hand over any other memos or interview notes relevant to Flynn’s interview. The judge set a Friday deadline to turn over the documents. He will decide on Flynn’s sentence next Monday. Sullivan’s interest in the documents appears to have been spurred by claims that Flynn’s lawyers made in a court filing submitted Tuesday night. Pointing to the McCabe memo, they noted that McCabe nudged Flynn toward meeting with the two FBI agents without an attorney present. He wrote that he told Flynn that a two-on-one meeting would be the “quickest” option. Flynn agreed and said he did not need to involve White House lawyers. McCabe also wrote in the memo that he and other FBI officials decided before the meeting that Flynn would not be warned ahead of the interview about the penalties of lying to the agents. McCabe noted that “they wanted Flynn to be relaxed” and “were concerned that giving the warnings might adversely affect the rapport.” Flynn’s lawyers said in Tuesday’s filing that he accepts responsibility for lying to the agents, though it is clear from the document that Flynn takes issue with how his FBI interview came about. The attorneys noted Flynn continued cooperating with the special counsel “even when circumstances later came to light that prompted extensive public debate about the investigation of General Flynn.” That appeared to be a reference to the ethical and legal problems now facing McCabe and Peter Strzok, one of the two agents who interviewed Flynn. Both McCabe and Strzok have been fired from the FBI — McCabe for making false statements of his own about authorizing contacts with the media and Strzok for exchanging anti-Trump text messages with his mistress, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page. It is unlikely that Sullivan’s review of the FBI documents will change his sentencing decision. Both the special counsel and Flynn’s legal team recommended that Flynn serve no jail time because of his extensive cooperation. But there is a chance that the documents could be filed in public view. That prospect could be a long shot, however, as Sullivan said that he would allow Flynn’s team and the special counsel to file the documents under seal if they wanted. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] Michael Flynn Judge Seeks Review Of Key FBI Notes Before Sentencing Decision | is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News


Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.