Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
News Feeder

Decaf Coffee Condemned As Heresy

Recommended Posts

Staff
21 minutes ago, News Feeder said:

article-3241-1-thumb.jpg

ST LOUIS, MO—In an ecumenical council convened in St. Louis last week, the use of decaf coffee was condemned as rank heresy.

The post Decaf Coffee Condemned As Heresy appeared first on The Babylon Bee.

View the original full article

I agree!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

It is, absolutly, an unnatural act and if YHWH does not recommend it in either Abrahamic, the Noadic, the Mosaic nor the Renewed Covenants... I'm agin ya'll.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post

From a little-known manuscript of Acts 15:19-20:

 

Act 15:19

Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:

 Act 15:20

But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, from decaf coffee and from things strangled, and from blood.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Distraught Parents of Suicide Victim Claim Minister Condemned Son During Funeral

      The parents of the University of Toledo freshman, Jeff and Linda, met with LaCuesta before the service to indicate what they wanted him to say at their son’s service. When he decided to instead preach a sermon emphasizing the sinfulness of suicide, Jeff was quick to react. The hurt father approached the priest in the middle of his condemning sermon, pleading “Father, please stop." LaCuesta did not halt the sermon, but continued to fling words of conviction. View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

    • Explain Heresy with Superhero Help

      The most significant threat to healthy Christian spirituality isn’t the threat of government persecution or even the cultural acceptance of unhealthy ethics, but incorrect understandings about God. Several common misunderstandings have flourished throughout church history. These paths toward error seem perfectly reasonable; the problem is they’re insufficiently considered in light of the whole Bible. Thus, groups like Docetists and Gnostics arose early in Christian history. More recently Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses have recycled historical errors. But theological error doesn’t just come in the form of nicely dressed people knocking on your door to hand out pamphlets. It comes in the form of half-completed discipleship, often with a healthy emphasis on Scripture but without reference to the way Christians have previously fit the data of Scripture together. Theological error is committed by well-meaning people who pick up a few bits of doctrine and try to put them together without understanding the whole picture. Good theology is important, but it can be hard to get people interested or know where to start. Careful theological work is sometimes dry and dusty business. When the pastor pounds the pulpit to proclaim the importance of a careful logical argument, it’s likely to cause eyes to glaze over. The problem is often not the significance of the issue, but the lack of a vocabulary to explain the problem. Vocabulary for Heresy Coming in to save the day is Superheroes Can’t Save You: Epic Examples of Historic Heresies, a recent book by Western Seminary theology professor Todd Miles. The book offers a creative presentation of a robust orthodox theology by showing how historical errors about the nature of God lead away from saving faith. It connects the church’s thinking about specific theological heresies to beliefs that are commonly held today. Miles offers a culturally accessible vocabulary to explain seven theological errors that continue to pop up in church history. Each chapter briefly describes a popular comic-book hero, illustrates how a common heresy is embodied in that hero, identifies where the error is present in our time, uses Scripture to debunk the error, and concludes by explaining why avoiding it is so important. For example, chapter one connects Docetism to Superman. Although the world around him sees mild-mannered Clark Kent, who seems merely a frail human, the reality is that the Man of Steel is an entirely different sort of being. The heart of Docetism is that Jesus was God in disguise, much like Clark Kent was an alien with superpowers disguised as an ordinary person; Docetists believed in Christ’s divinity while minimizing his humanity. The Superman heresy is problematic because it undermines the common humanity we share with Christ. Thus, when we see Christ’s moral example in Scripture, our response may well be apathy and disappointment, rather than obedience. After all, if Jesus wasn’t human, then he couldn’t have experienced temptation in the same way we do. But that is not the case (e.g., Heb. 4:15). Miles then outlines a biblical doctrine of the true humanity of Christ, showing that if Jesus wasn’t truly human, his sacrificial death couldn’t have reconciled us to God. In this way Miles uses Batman, Ant-Man, Thor, Green Lantern, the Hulk, and Spider-man to illustrate common heresies and show why they’re significant. In doing so, he combats theological liberalism, Modalism, Arianism, Adoptionism, Apolliniarianism, and Eutychianism. Simply getting some people to read a book that defines and refutes these errors, particularly using the terms themselves, requires something like a superpower, which makes me wonder what Miles’s origin story is. Rousing Success Any book that depends heavily on a cultural meme to engage audiences is likely to be either a catastrophic failure––falling into gimmickry and labored analogies––or a rousing success. The opportunities for the former are wide, varied, and easy. Miles, however, successfully navigates the pitfalls of his approach to produce an important and helpful volume that offers both clear theology and practical application. Superheroes Can’t Save You is a success that makes sound theology culturally relatable. This is the sort of book that’s useful for individual or group study. Each chapter includes questions for personal reflection and for group discussion. It’s clear this book is an exercise in pursuing truth for the sake of holiness, rather than a theological exercise for its own sake. Miles has done a lot of the legwork to connect right belief to proper living, which increases the usefulness of this volume. Getting people to read theology can be a challenge. A great deal of theology tends to fall into extremes: the most engaging presentations are often the most harmful, while some of the most important theology is difficult to read. There are wonderful exceptions, but those exceptions are altogether too infrequent. When an author combines an engaging approach with sound, practical theology, his or her work should be celebrated. Superheroes Can’t Save You is such a book. View the full article

      in Christian Current Events

    • IBM has invented coffee drones – and they predict when you need a cup

      The barista handing you your cup of coffee might one day be a drone. IBM has secured a patent for a coffee drone that not only flies around public spaces to deliver cups of brew but also predicts which people need caffeine pick-me-ups. According to paperwork filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the device could be used in an office, cafe or event setting, where a preordered cup of joe would be delivered to the drinker or where a thirsty individual would flag it down. Facial- or voice-recognition software, an electronic ID tag or Bluetooth from a person’s smartphone ensures the coffee gets to the right person. Plus, the drone could proactively deliver the java, the Armonk, New York-based company’s application explained. The drone would assess someone’s recent sleep quality via a Fitbit or similar tracking device, electronic calendar (such as the time of day the event is held, the type of meeting it is and who’s attending), biometrics, blood pressure, pupil dilation, facial expressions and wake-up time. The drone could cross-reference medications that interact with caffeine and know whom not to serve, if granted access to a coffee lover’s medical information. Download our FREE Mobile App - The Highest Rated Military News App in the World! IBM’s patent form also envisions applications for bars, where the drone can determine whether a person has drunk too much alcohol by looking for sleepiness (like the head angled downward or drooping eyelids), unsteadiness or slurred speech cues. If any are noted, the drone wouldn’t bring any more drinks and would ignore the individual if he or she tries to flag it down. The drone also would determine if any booze was headed to a child – and not serve the minor. To be clear, these aren’t as small as the mini drones people love to fly around in air space. And don’t expect a coffee drone buzzing around to bring you your daily buzz any time soon, though. “IBM encourages our researchers to pursue their interests even though not all of their inventions become commercial products,” spokeswoman Amanda Carl said in an email. “By publishing their inventions as patents, we give our researchers the recognition they deserve and make their work public, so it can inspire new innovations.” To Ryan Calo, a University of Washington School of Law drone expert, the coffee drone proposal is trying to do too much. “It’s a combination of technology that is ready for prime time and technology that clearly is not ready for prime time,” he said. “It’s a drone that flies coffee around. It’s going to be hard, cross referencing all these (factors) … Why not use a land-based cart?” The answer is simple: People love food with theatrics. Think conveyor belt sushi restaurants in Japan, flambe dishes and burger joints and frozen-yogurt shops that use robots to prepare or serve food. It’s how this coffee is served that has Colin Newell, a coffee industry expert based in Canada, raising concerns about safety. “The fundamental flaw here is transporting hot liquids through the air,” he said. “It’s a shtick as much as Amazon saying it’ll deliver parcels to your home by drone.” ——— © 2018 USA Today Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC. View the full article

      in Military

    • So much heresy!

      in Lounge

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.