Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Christian and Theologically Protestant? Or, sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Fenced Community

Christforums is a Protestant Christian forum, open to Bible-believing Christians such as Presbyterians, Lutherans, Reformed, Baptists, Church of Christ members, Pentecostals, Anglicans. Methodists, Charismatics, or any other conservative, Nicene- derived Christian Church. We do not solicit cultists of any kind, including Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Eastern Lightning, Falun Gong, Unification Church, Aum Shinrikyo, Christian Scientists or any other non-Nicene, non-Biblical heresy.
Register now

Christian Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Knotical

Electrical Question

Recommended Posts

This is for the electrical engineers of the group, or at those who fancy themselves in that group.  I have a couple of motion sensor switches I want to install in my bathrooms.  The problem is that nearly nothing in this house is grounded, as it was built in the 50's.  My question is, is it possible, or simply inadvisable, to connect the ground wire of the switch to the neutral wire, which should ultimately be connected to the main ground out at the power pole?  Is this stupidly dangerous, or actually quite doable?

Share this post


Link to post
Staff
18 hours ago, Knotical said:

This is for the electrical engineers of the group, or at those who fancy themselves in that group.  I have a couple of motion sensor switches I want to install in my bathrooms.  The problem is that nearly nothing in this house is grounded, as it was built in the 50's.  My question is, is it possible, or simply inadvisable, to connect the ground wire of the switch to the neutral wire, which should ultimately be connected to the main ground out at the power pole?  Is this stupidly dangerous, or actually quite doable?

The current goes from your power panel to the bathroom where you'll attach the switch. The neutral wire returns the current from the switch to the power panel where the wire goes to ground. The ground wire actually would prevent the object (switch or motion sensor) from being electrified should that path be broken through the neutral wire as the current would seek the nearest ground wire.

 

If you don't have a ground and the return path or neutral wire breaks then someone that touches or even comes in proximity of the switch or sensor would be electrocuted should they themselves be grounded as they would act like the ground wire (assuming feet are on the floor etc) and complete the circuit.

 

If I were you, with children in the house, I'd seek the professional guidance of a licensed electrician.

 

God bless,

William

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
On 8/27/2018 at 4:11 PM, William said:

The current goes from your power panel to the bathroom where you'll attach the switch. The neutral wire returns the current from the switch to the power panel where the wire goes to ground. The ground wire actually would prevent the object (switch or motion sensor) from being electrified should that path be broken through the neutral wire as the current would seek the nearest ground wire.

 

If you don't have a ground and the return path or neutral wire breaks then someone that touches or even comes in proximity of the switch or sensor would be electrocuted should they themselves be grounded as they would act like the ground wire (assuming feet are on the floor etc) and complete the circuit.

 

If I were you, with children in the house, I'd seek the professional guidance of a licensed electrician.

 

God bless,

William

William's advise is the safest and the most expensive.  Exception: I you are a member of an assembly that believes and practises the Church Family Concept there should be members of the Trades and one of them will be an Electrician that has enough experience to run a ground wire from either the Steel Water Service Pipe (found in most garages) or from a Copper Coated Steel Ground Rod. 

 

If you choose to do this yourself, hammer the five or six foot Grounding Rod into the dirt, leaving no more than 2 inches above ground and when purchasing your supplies at the Hardware Store be sure to purchase a Grounding Clamp of the correct size (slip it over the top of the Rod to check the size).  These clamps, from m fragile memory, are made of two pieces of steel that are, when clamped into place, on one open corner will lock that side together and the other side bolts together.  On the proper clamp there is a bolt or screw to afix the Ground Wire to.  With Fence Post Staples attach the New Ground to the side of the house on a Stud, located by finding a verticle3 line of nail heads or impression of hidden nail heads.  Run your Ground through the attic to the Top Plate with wire dropping through it and with a Wall Switch or Plug Outlet closesr to your new device.

 

I was a first year Carpenter in the lare fifties and recall many of the houses were built with only the Fuse Box grounded and some I ran across in the seventies through the eighties did not have anything grounded.

 

Most Devices run on Direct (same as Battery) Current and Alternating Current means the Hot Wire swaps back and forth and the source to your Electronic Device, left ungrounded, can e blown anjd possibly start a fire.

 

Good decisions and may YHWH bless you and yours.

Share this post


Link to post

You have to have a ground if you have electricity in your house. The power company bring a ground when it reaches your house. However, its not real difficult to buy a ground rod, and pound it in the ground and connect a 1/8 inch copper wire from the rod to your houses electrical box, but unless you know for sure what your doing do NOT attempt it. However I can't imagine that you have no ground. If you have a GFI plug then you have a ground.

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Just Mike said:

You have to have a ground if you have electricity in your house. The power company bring a ground when it reaches your house. However, its not real difficult to buy a ground rod, and pound it in the ground and connect a 1/8 inch copper wire from the rod to your houses electrical box, but unless you know for sure what your doing do NOT attempt it. However I can't imagine that you have no ground. If you have a GFI plug then you have a ground.

That is true for modern houses, but mine was built in the 50's, and subsequently added onto, but apparently not at a time where grounding was required.  Most of the house is not grounded.  The only things I can figure that are is the HVAC system on the roof, and the power running to the detached garage (which I will have to have more than one breaker for, but that is another story).

Share this post


Link to post

You can purchase a plug in device that tell you if you have reverse polarity, or the ground is not good at Lowes of Home Depot or some place like them , for under $10. I have wired several houses for friends and use it to make sure my connections were tight and everything is properly done.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Poll Question: The Rich man and Lazarus Parable or Not?

      Is the story of the Rich man and Lazarus a parable and does it really make a difference?  Wouldn't the story still teach the same truths even if is a parable?   John Calvin held the view that it is not a parable but he also states "But that is of little consequence, provided that the reader comprehends the doctrine which it contains."

      in Bible Study

    • Federal Judge Orders Removal Of Citizenship Question From 2020 Census

      By Kevin Daley - A federal judge in New York barred the Trump administration from including a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire. The decision appears to have significant implications for a related matter the Supreme Court is poised to decide in the spring. “The attempts by the Trump administration to mandate a question about citizenship were not rooted in a desire to strengthen the census process and would only undermine our immigrant communities,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. “Inciting fear in our residents is not only immoral, but also ill-conceived.” The Constitution mandates a census every ten years to apportion seats in the House of Representatives among the states. Population is also used as a basis for rewarding federal aid. A coalition of Democratic cities, states, and interest groups challenged the addition of a citizenship question to the census questionnaire in April 2018, warning it would discourage minority participation. An incomplete survey of minority populations, the plaintiffs feared, would result in diminished federal funds and congressional representation for urban areas. The plaintiffs charged that the addition of the citizenship question violated the Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), a federal law establishing protocols for the issuance of regulations. In his Tuesday decision, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman accepted the plaintiffs’ APA claims while rejecting their constitutional arguments. “[Ross] failed to consider several important aspects of the problem; alternately ignored, cherry-picked, or badly misconstrued the evidence in the record before him; acted irrationally both in light of that evidence and his own stated decisional criteria; and failed to justify significant departures from past policies and practices — a veritable smorgasbord of classic, clear-cut APA violations,” Furman wrote. Elsewhere in the decision, Furman said Ross was not truthful about his motives for adding a citizenship question. Though the secretary initially said publicly that the question was added at the request of the Department of Justice, subsequent evidence showed Ross discussed the matter with White House aides far earlier than initially understood. “Finally, and perhaps most egregiously, the evidence is clear that Secretary Ross’s rationale was pretextual — that is, that the real reason for his decision was something other than the sole reason he put forward in his memorandum,” Furman wrote. Former President Barack Obama elevated Furman to the federal bench in 2012. The plaintiffs sought a deposition from Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross at a previous phase of the litigation. The Department of Commerce oversees the Census Bureau, and Ross himself authorized the addition of the citizenship question. Though Furman authorized the Ross deposition, the Supreme Court intervened to stop it in October 2018. Shortly thereafter in November 2018, the high court agreed to decide what evidence Furman could rely upon when making his decision. When plaintiffs challenge agency action in court, the agency itself generally turns over the body of documents and evidence it relied upon to make its decision. Those writings are called the administrative record. In most cases of this nature, the court will make its decision based only on the administrative record. However, Furman allowed the plaintiffs to gather evidence beyond the administrative record to challenge the citizenship question. The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether that decision was correct. The Justice Department may appeal Furman’s decision. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] Federal Judge Orders Removal Of Citizenship Question From 2020 Census is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • David Hogg Avoids CNN’s Simple Question About Gun Control

      By Nick Givas - Parkland school shooting survivor David Hogg ignored a simple question about gun control and background checks on CNN’s “New Day” Tuesday and refused to answer directly. Host Alisyn Camerota asked Hogg if universal background checks would have prevented the tragedy at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School and he failed to come up with a clear answer. “I think there’s many instances and instances of gun violence that could have stopped further acts of gun violence. There’s 40,000 people that die of gun violence every year and a very small minority of them end up being in school shootings,” he replied. “When we’re talking about hardening our schools and different things, what we’re not talking about is how we’re going to make our communities safer. When we’re talking about school safety we’re neglecting the thousands of students that die either coming to school or coming back from school every day or simply just outside their house.” “Our congressmen and our elected officials have said that they don’t care about them or their violence because of the zip code they live in or the number of figures in their bank account,” Hogg continued. “And if we really want to start talking about a national emergency like the president likes to talk about, 40,000 Americans dying annually from gun violence is a pretty damn good one to start out with.” Hogg then claimed the Parkland shooting could have been prevented but didn’t provide details on what could have stopped it. He also blamed the NRA for the violence and accused them of trying to “benefit” from mass shootings. “It is an issue that is non-partisan. At least, I would hope so, considering the fact that both Democrats and Republicans die from gun violence. Bullets don’t discriminate and neither should our legislators. No legislator should look at these laws and say to themselves, oh I can’t vote on that because I’ve taken campaign contributions from the NRA. That’s what they’re thinking,” he said. “The American people need to wake up and realize again and again, the reason these laws are not getting passed — the reason why — for example, disarming people like the shooter at our high school could have happened through an extreme risk protection but didn’t is because that law was actively advocated against by the National Rifle Association. That uses due process to disarm people like terrorists and domestic abusers, but they actively try to stop because it stops these things from happening in the first place, which they benefit from. [sic] Because after every single mass shooting, gun sales go up significantly and the NRA benefits from that.” Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] David Hogg Avoids CNN’s Simple Question About Gun Control is original content from Conservative Daily News - Where Americans go for news, current events and commentary they can trust - Conservative News Website for U.S. News, Political Cartoons and more. View the original full article

      in Political Conservative News

    • Need help with an apologetics question re: Old Covenant

      I was talking with a somewhat liberal Catholic who has also attended the Eastern Orthodox for a period of time.  He said that he didn't believe in the Catholic notion that if you commit one mortal sin you go to hell, but that there was certainly greater and lesser sins.  I said that I believed all sins were mortal in a sense, in that we all deserve hell for our sins. He said that if that were the case, then Christians would be worse off then under the Old Covenant where you could sacrifice animals to atone for sin and Gentile God-fearers could be saved.  I asked what was the point of Jesus coming and dying if some of us could be a sinner that was "not really that bad", but beyond that I blanked out on how to answer his point.   Any input would be greatly appreciated if only so I can answer myself in my own mind. 🙂

      in Apologetics and Theology

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.