Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community forums. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Christian Fellowship Community Forums

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
William

What's the Difference Between Arminianism, Calvinism and Hyper-Calvinism?

Recommended Posts

Staff

Tom Ascol

 

The late Martyn Lloyd-Jones was reported to have said that “the ignorant Arminian doesn’t know the difference between Calvinism and hyper-Calvinism.” Based on the frequency with which the two are often confused I would suggest that the ignorance is not limited to our Arminian friends. While much more could be said, the following summary reveals the basic differences between Arminianism, Calvinism, and hyper-Calvinism.

 

The Similarity of Arminianism and hyper-Calvinism

 

In one sense, hyper-Calvinism, like Arminianism, is a rationalistic perversion of true Calvinism. Whereas Arminianism undermines divine sovereignty, hyper-Calvinism undermines human responsibility. The irony is that both Arminianism and hyper-Calvinism start from the same, erroneous rationalistic presupposition, namely that human ability and responsibility are coextensive. That is, they must match up exactly or else it is irrational. If a man is to be held responsible for something, then he must have the ability to do it. On the other hand, if a man does not have the ability to perform it, he cannot be obligated to do it.

 

Arminian Rationalism

 

The Arminian looks at this premise and says, “Agreed! We know that the Bible holds all people responsible to repent and believe [which is true]. Therefore we must conclude that all men have the ability in themselves to repent and believe [which is false, according to the Bible].” Thus, Arminians teach that unconverted people have within themselves the spiritual ability to repent and believe, albeit such ability must be aided by grace.

 

Hyper-Calvinist Rationalism

 

The hyper-Calvinist takes the same premise (that man’s ability and responsibility are coextensive) and says, “Agreed! We know that the Bible teaches that in and of themselves all men are without spiritual ability to repent and believe [which is true]. Therefore we must conclude that unconverted people are not under obligation to repent and believe the gospel [which is false, according to the Bible].”

 

Biblical Calvinism

 

In contrast to both of these, the Calvinist looks at the premise and says, “Wrong! While it looks reasonable, it is not biblical. The Bible teaches both that fallen man is without spiritual ability and that he is obligated to repent and believe. Only by the powerful, regenerating work of the Holy Spirit is man given the ability to fulfill his duty to repent and believe.” And though this may seem unreasonable to rationalistic minds, there is no contradiction, and it is precisely the position the Bible teaches. The Calvinist view may appear irrational but in reality is supra-rational—it is revealed.

 

Source: http://founders.org/2016/05/10/whats...per-calvinism/

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for completeness, would you care to add a brief remark on Weslyan Arminianism, which at least starts out like Calvinism?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are all sorts of things which could (rightly) earn somebody the label "hyper Calvinist," such as equal ultimacy.

 

For others, merely to be high Calvinist is sufficient to qualify you as hyper Calvinist.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There are all sorts of things which could (rightly) earn somebody the label "hyper Calvinist," such as equal ultimacy.

 

For others, merely to be high Calvinist is sufficient to qualify you as hyper Calvinist.

 

Both of your statements are true, the latter is also a sad fact.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Nation's Grandmas Still Unclear On Difference Between Facebook Comment, Private Message

      U.S.—According to a new report, the nation's grandmothers are still unclear on the difference between a public Facebook comment and a private message. The post Nation's Grandmas Still Unclear On Difference Between Facebook Comment, Private Message appeared first on The Babylon Bee. View the original full article

      in Christian Satire

    • John 6:65-66 and Arminianism

      John 6:65-66 (65) And He was saying, “For this reason I have said to you, that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father.” (66) As a result of this many of His disciples withdrew and were not walking with Him anymore.    Verse 65 corresponds to what the Lord Jesus said earlier in John 6:44.   In verse 66 those who rejected what Christ said in verse 65 withdrew from him. His words from verse 65 caused them to disassociate from Him.   I do w

      in Arminianism

    • Calvinism vs Free WIll

      I don't believe in Calvanism, because the verses referring to predestination in the Bible are not referring to salvation, but rather the idea that God can do what he wants, assuming it isn't contradicting his just and loving nature. However, obviously, Calvanism does contradict God's nature.   It makes a literal joke of free will, obedience, and justice. How can one be condemned to hell, knowing his/her own actions did not send him/her there? Normally Calvanists have some weird story to expla

      in Theological Debate

    • Learn the Difference between Right and Almost Right

      If this past month was a reliable indicator, my family should be shopping for discernment at Costco. Difficult decisions multiplied, and there was no blinking “Thou shalt” or “Thou shalt not” to light the way. Old family friends, desperate to save their sinking business, asked to borrow a large sum of money. Did we lend it? Our eldest, entering her senior year of high school, talked of pursuing a music degree after graduation. Given the career prospects, did we advise against it? A group of vol

      in Christian Current Events

    • What is the difference between a denomination and a cult?

      Quite simply a denomination is Christian because it adheres to the essentials of the Christian faith. All denominations despite any doctrinal differences agree on key central essentials of the faith. In other words, denomination are Christian because they're unified by the essential truths conveyed from Scripture.   So what are the essentials of the Christian faith and are there any objective criteria in discerning a denomination from a cult?   God bless, William  

      in Apologetics and Theology

×
×
  • Create New...