Jump to content

The Protestant Community

Sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community forums. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Christian Fellowship Community Forums

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
ChatterBox

Male and female clergy?

Recommended Posts

This is something that has come up in looking at local churches and I was curious to get another view on this. When the church accepted female clergy and reverends, one of the arguments was that it was easier for women in the flock to relate to a female minister, and therefore all-male clergy at a church could make it harder for some of the flock to come to them with problems. That I can understand and support. However, surely the same thing should apply to a church with an all-female clergy?

 

One of the churches we were looking at has all seven clergy positions and support roles filled by women. I don't know why this bothers me so much, but it doesn't feel quite right. I know they are Reverends called to the church, that they have been through the training and serve their community the best they can. Yet I can think of too many situations where men, particularly young men, would not want to bring up their troubles to a woman any more than a woman would to a man.

 

I think my common sense is conflicting with my modern sensibilities, so I'd like to hear another viewpoint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having women in the clergy is unbiblical. That is why it doesn't feel right. Paul actually speaks about this in one of his epistles. They try to use the account of Deborah as an excuse to allow woman to be pastors/reverands/priests, but that argument fails as soon as it begins. Any church that has women in leadership roles is one where the men are not stepping up to fill those roles, and the church is worse off for it.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The world is changing and Women are always fighting for their rights and also for equity. Sometimes men have no choice but to let them even though it doesn't feel right. The point is, it should be balanced, not a clergy full of just Women. When a clergy is only made up of men, they complain, they too should lead by example. However, I personally have no issue with women being in the clergy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When the church accepted female clergy and reverends, one of the arguments was that it was easier for women in the flock to relate to a female minister, and therefore all-male clergy at a church could make it harder for some of the flock to come to them with problems.

It may be true that women would feel more comfortable sharing their problems with another woman, but that doesn't mean the woman they share with must be a member of the clergy. It might be helpful for a church to have mature women to serve as counselors for women but such women should not be considered part of the clergy.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The world is changing and Women are always fighting for their rights and also for equity. Sometimes men have no choice but to let them even though it doesn't feel right. The point is, it should be balanced, not a clergy full of just Women. When a clergy is only made up of men, they complain, they too should lead by example. However, I personally have no issue with women being in the clergy.

 

There is always a choice. And when a church gets to a point where they need to make this choice means there are no longer enough Godly men within that congregation to fill the roles they should, which means that church is heading down a bad road. Including becoming apostate.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The world is changing

 

When the world changes, should Christ's Church change along with it? Do we take our lead from those who are in rebellion against our King and His Kingdom?

 

I personally have no issue with women being in the clergy.

 

What would you say to a person who told you that he has "no issue" with the use of temple prostitutes?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

When the world changes, should Christ's Church change along with it? Do we take our lead from those who are in rebellion against our King and His Kingdom?

 

 

 

What would you say to a person who told you that he has "no issue" with the use of temple prostitutes?

 

I think that you are taking it the wrong way. Maybe we interpret that message the way we shouldn't. If we say women shouldn't lead or shouldn't serve as clergy, we fall into the category of sexists. Do you know why women were prohibited from being in the clergy? If it's because of their sinful nature, we too are sinners and God is the only one who should judge. When Jesus Christ first came, his message was only to the Jews then it became available to everyone. Jesus did not come to change the law of Moses but to improve it. Why is it that the law on Women is interpreted as it is in the Old Testament. If a woman is said to have a calling, it's not our right to choose who should and who shouldn't be in the clergy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think that you are taking it the wrong way. Maybe we interpret that message the way we shouldn't. If we say women shouldn't lead or shouldn't serve as clergy, we fall into the category of sexists. Do you know why women were prohibited from being in the clergy? If it's because of their sinful nature, we too are sinners and God is the only one who should judge. When Jesus Christ first came, his message was only to the Jews then it became available to everyone. Jesus did not come to change the law of Moses but to improve it. Why is it that the law on Women is interpreted as it is in the Old Testament. If a woman is said to have a calling, it's not our right to choose who should and who shouldn't be in the clergy.

 

Well, we know it is not their sin nature, as then there wouldn't be anyone in the clergy, period. Unless I am mistaken, God did not spell out why he only wanted men as part of the clergy, but I am sure there is a bit we can infer from the bible in that the family is a smaller model of church in that the man is the head of the household, therefore, only men are part of the clergy. We can also look at the example of Jesus being head of the church (a man) and the church is considered His bride (female reference).

 

By the way, if you consider only allowing men to be part of the clergy then you could be calling God sexist. Is that really a road you want to go down?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If we say women shouldn't lead or shouldn't serve as clergy, we fall into the category of sexists.

No, we fall into the category of those who obey God. Here are the qualification Paul gave for an elder in 1 Timothy 3:1-7:

 

[1] The saying is trustworthy: If anyone aspires to the office of overseer, he desires a noble task. [2] Therefore an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, [3] not a drunkard, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. [4] He must manage his own household well, with all dignity keeping his children submissive, [5] for if someone does not know how to manage his own household, how will he care for God's church? [6] He must not be a recent convert, or he may become puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation of the devil. [7] Moreover, he must be well thought of by outsiders, so that he may not fall into disgrace, into a snare of the devil.

 

God made men and women different and he gave them different roles to play in carrying out his work.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you know why women were prohibited from being in the clergy?

 

Yes. I do know why. There are several biblical texts forbidding it. There is also the example of Christ and His male disciples, and lastly there are both the creation order and marriage which all point in the same direction.

 

 

Jesus did not come to change the law of Moses but to improve it.

 

Please tell me why you think Jesus came to "improve" on the Law.

 

 

If a woman is said to have a calling, it's not our right to choose who should and who shouldn't be in the clergy.

 

It's not only our right but our responsibility to keep women from fulfilling their desire to rule over men, whether that be in church or home.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Topics

    • Library Under Fire For Hosting Controversial 'Straight Male Story Hour'

      BOSTON, MA—A local library has found itself embroiled in controversy after hosting a controversial "Straight Male Story Hour," an event at which a heterosexual, married, white, cisgender male reads a story to children. The post Library Under Fire For Hosting Controversial 'Straight Male Story Hour' appeared first on The Babylon Bee. View the original full article

      in Christian Satire

    • Democrats Call Out Media For Heaping Praise On All The White Male Candidates

      By Chris White - Democrats are complaining about what they believe is the media’s penchant for heaping loads of praise on the white men running against President Donald Trump in 2020. They want to know why the lady candidates are not receiving similar treatment. National media are heaping too much praise on Beto O’Rourke and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, according to Mary Anne Marsh, a Democratic political consultant. It’s not fair to the women in the race for the White House and is star

      in Political Conservative News

    • Traitor To Feminism Bringing Another White Male Into The World

      BROCKHURST, ND — Carly Jenson and her husband Brad surprised friends and family on social media this morning by announcing they're expecting a son. “I’m so excited to finally become a father,” Brad told reporters. Carly says she is just as excited and can’t wait to bring her first child into the world. The post Traitor To Feminism Bringing Another White Male Into The World appeared first on The Babylon Bee. View the original full article

      in Christian Satire

    • Male Runners Continue Dominating Girls’ High School Track In Connecticut

      By Peter Hasson - Two male runners are continuing to dominate high school girls’ track in Connecticut. High school juniors Terry Miller and Andraya Yearwood took first and second place in the state open indoor track championships on Feb. 16, the Associated Press noted in a report on Sunday. Both Miller and Yearwood are biological males who identify as transgender girls. One of their competitors, high school junior Selina Soule, told the AP that it was unfair to force female runners to com

      in Political Conservative News

    • Equal Rights: Male-Only Military Draft System Ruled Unconstitutional

      By R. Mitchell - A federal judge ruled Friday that the Selective Service military draft program is unconstitutional as women are now eligible for combat roles. A lawsuit brought by the National Coalition for Men, a men’s rights group, challenged the current Selective Service System as sexually discriminatory and asked the court to declare it unlawful. Judge Gray Miller, a U.S. District Judge in Houston, Texas, said in his ruling that, “while historical restrictions on women in the military m

      in Political Conservative News

×
×
  • Create New...