Jump to content

The Christian Protestant Community Forums

Sincerely inquiring about the Protestant faith? Welcome to Christforums the Christian Protestant community forums. You'll first need to register in order to join our community. Create or respond to threads on your favorite topics and subjects. Registration takes less than a minute, it's simple, fast, and free! Enjoy the fellowship! God bless, Christforums' Staff
Register now

Community Fellowship

John Calvin puts forward a very simple reason why love is the greatest gift: “Because faith and hope are our own: love is diffused among others.” In other words, faith and hope benefit the possessor, but love always benefits another. In John 13:34–35 Jesus says, “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” Love always requires an “other” as an object; love cannot remain within itself, and that is part of what makes love the greatest gift.
Sign in to follow this  
Support

New York Post: Hillary Clinton Wants To Take From The Rich And Give To The Poor

Recommended Posts

The Lord Jesus Christ was glad to give to the poor he gave them health, life, hope, so I am not so sure why anybody thinks it is bad to give to the poor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Staff
The Lord Jesus Christ was glad to give to the poor he gave them health, life, hope, so I am not so sure why anybody thinks it is bad to give to the poor.

 

Lemme take everything you have and not give a single thing from my own account..... and then you'll know Hillary Clinton. An example: I am on the beach having a sandwich. A guy comes walking by and demands that I give them my sandwich. A liberal comes by high on a horse and puts a gun to my head and says give the guy my sandwich. This is a prime example of how the government strips the virtue from a transactions. Perhaps the guy thinks he is entitled to several sandwiches? Do you think I gave freely? Do you think the liberal mediated the transaction in virtue? Did the liberal give them a sandwich of their own? NO! whenever the government is involved there is an element of coercion and the virtue is stripped from the transaction.

 

God bless,

William

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Staff

 

Please acknowledge a single thing put to you. Are you liberal?

 

God bless,

William

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the liberal party in Australia is rather right wing; our current federal government is run by the Liberal party.

 

And I did answer your hypothetical about the sandwich envying poor guy and the bleeding heart liberal with the gun. Didn't happen in 8 years of Bill Clinton so why will it happen if Hillary gets elected?

Lemme take everything you have and not give a single thing from my own account..... and then you'll know Hillary Clinton. An example: I am on the beach having a sandwich. A guy comes walking by and demands that I give them my sandwich. A liberal comes by high on a horse and puts a gun to my head and says give the guy my sandwich. This is a prime example of how the government strips the virtue from a transactions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Staff
No, the liberal party in Australia is rather right wing; our current federal government is run by the Liberal party.

 

And I did answer your hypothetical about the sandwich envying poor guy and the bleeding heart liberal with the gun. Didn't happen in 8 years of Bill Clinton so why will it happen if Hillary gets elected?

 

Personally I don't see why democrats hold Clinton name as highly regarded. He is an impeached president. A man who jeopardized national security, and lied countless times. Furthermore, you have committed the fallacy of equivalence, switching out the meaning for something else, unless you are contending Hillary is the same person as Bill? And if so, do you think we'd support another impeached president?

 

Lemme ask you a question, how can you support such a person that says abortion should be moral and the Catholic church should abandon their belief's in favor of her party's agenda?

 

Do you think Conservatives such as I will negotiate our moral principals in favor of economics? What's your price?

 

God bless,

William

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not right, there was an attempted impeachment and it failed didn't it? He served a full two terms. And now your country is nearing the end of two terms of President Obama (a Democrat I believe). So if the USA elects Hillary Clinton there may be another 8 years of a democrat in the white house. Not a happy prospect for those who vote Republican I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Staff
That's not right, there was an attempted impeachment and it failed didn't it? He served a full two terms. And now your country is nearing the end of two terms of President Obama (a Democrat I believe). So if the USA elects Hillary Clinton there may be another 8 years of a democrat in the white house. Not a happy prospect for those who vote Republican I guess.

 

Clinton was impeached.

 

God bless,

William

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, maybe the reps did but the senate didn't.

Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, was impeached by the House of Representatives on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice, on December 19, 1998. Two other impeachment articles, a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power, failed in the House. He was acquitted of both charges by the Senate on February 12, 1999.
(source here)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Staff
Well, maybe the reps did but the senate didn't.

(source here)

 

Clinton was impeached by the House on two charges. The first being perjury, and the second being obstruction of justice. Following this he was acquitted by the senate.Feb 4, 2012. Two other impeachment articles, a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power, failed in the House.

 

This is why liberals want non citizens to vote.

 

God bless,

William

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Clinton was impeached by the House on two charges. The first being perjury, and the second being obstruction of justice. Following this he was acquitted by the senate.Feb 4, 2012. Two other impeachment articles, a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power, failed in the House.

 

This is why liberals want non citizens to vote.

 

God bless,

William

 

 

The citizens didn't vote on impeachment, the house did and the senate acquitted.

 

Isn't the Boston Tea Party remembered - at least in part - for the slogan "No taxation without representation" so if the non-citizens pay tax why not grant representation? That would mean a vote wouldn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...